Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.,. <br /> <br />J;--- <br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MA YNES, BRADFORD & SHIPPS <br />ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br />p, 0, Box 2717 <br /> <br />303--247-1755 <br /> <br />. ~;'f;;;f&f~J(fr;;f;;] <br />d! ,JUL. 18 ""5W' <br />60 1984 <br />CO'\lS~~~,q!?O W... <br />. .'iI!O/lj " 't!? <br />801jf(D <br /> <br />125 WV.ST TENTH STREET <br /> <br />DURANGO, CoLORADO 81301 <br /> <br />FRANK E. (SAM) M"-VNES <br />BYRON V. BR",nFORD <br />THOMAS H, Smpps <br />SARA DUNCAN <br />RJ:IlF::C'CA MICHA}:L <br /> <br />July 16, 1984 <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />823 State Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> <br />RE: Proposed Contract - San Miguel Water Conservancy District/ <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Re Feasibility Report on Cone Reservoir <br /> <br />Gentlemen: <br /> <br />As general counsel for the San Miguel Water Conservancy District, we have been <br />asked to express our legal opinion regarding the validity of the execution of <br />the contract on behalf of the San Miguel Water Conservancy District. At a <br />duly called special meeting of the Board of Directors of the San Miguel Water <br />Conservancy District held on June 4, 1984, the Board authorized Mr. William Bray, <br />duly elected President of the District, to execute the subject contract on behalf <br />of said District. Under the pertinent laws of the state of Colorado, Mr. Bray, <br />as the duly elected President, does have authority to bind the District to the <br />provisions of the subject contract. <br /> <br />As a result of the meeting and the action of the Board of Directors at said <br />meeting, the contract was validly approved by the Board of Directors. It is our <br />further opinion that the Board of Directors of the San Miguel Water Conservancy <br />District has the authority to enter into the contract without a vote of its <br />electors inasmuch as the contract comes within the "water supply exception" of <br />the Colorado Constitution, Article XI, Section 1, and that there are no provisions <br />in the state statutes which prevent this contract from binding the San Miguel <br />Water Conservancy District. <br /> <br />It is our considered judgment and op~n~on that the contract will be valid and <br />binding against the San Miguel Water Conservancy District if entered into by the <br />state of Colorado. <br /> <br />Very truly yours, <br /> <br />FEM: ilm <br /> <br />?:?!:~s? <br /> <br />~~- <br /> <br />,_ _~c ,..:~':..--:-'c.~~' -".,~ -"'_'_:~~ -~ ~. .:..==" ,~;.;' <br /> <br />~,--,--.--:--- <br />. .. <br /> <br />, <br />} <br />