My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00495
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00495
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:17:47 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:58:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153678
Contractor Name
Lower Arkansas Water Management Association
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
67
County
Prowers
Bill Number
SB 96-124
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />H~ & WILLIAMSEN, PC. 303illt165 <br /> <br />ATIACHMENT <br />Agenda Item CFc <br />January 19, 1994 <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />The Lower Arkansas Water Management Association (LAWMA) is a non-profit <br />corporation formed generally to provide replacement water for the owners of wells in the <br />Arkansas River basin in Water District 67. At present, there are 139 members in LAWMA <br />and they own or operate~wells that are used for a variety of irrigation, municipal, and <br />commercial purposes, <br /> <br />According to recent studies by the State Engineer's Office about 150,000 acres were <br />irrigated in Water District 67 in 1985. Irrigation water in the area is derived through several <br />ditches diverting from the Arkansas River and its tributaries, from releases from the Fort Lyon <br />and Great Plains storage systems, and from approximately 580 large capacity irrigation wells. <br />The wells were developed dllring " period beginning about 1940 and extending into 1976. <br />According to the December 1990 Water Budget developed by Boyle Engineering Corporation <br />for use in Kansas v. Colorado, the total irrigation supply in Water District 67 averaged <br />approximately 395,000 acre-feet annually during 1976-85, of which an average of more than <br />100,000 acre-feet annually was derived from wells. During dry years, however, the wells <br />provided a larger percentage of the total supply, Colorado Agricultural statistics indicate the <br />income from this irrigated land exceeded $40 million annually during 1988-92. Thus, irrigated <br />agriculture in Water District 67 is a significar1t part of the overall economy of this part of the <br />state, and water from the Irrigation wells make a very important contribution to the irrigated <br />agriculture. <br /> <br />Wells also provide the water for essentially all the domestic and commercial uses in <br />the water district. Lamar, Holly, Eads, Hugo, and Kit Carson are among the larger cities and <br />towns and are LAWMA members. Importarlt commercial uses include cattle feeding, hog <br />breeding farms, a natural gas pumping station, and electrical power generation. <br /> <br />At the present time, wells in the Arkllnsas River basin for other than small capacity <br />domestic and livestock purposes are operated in accordance with .. Rules and Regulations <br />Governing the Use, Control, and Protection of Surface and Ground Water Rights Located in <br />thp. ArkAn~A" Rivp.r "nd Its Tributaries" promulgated by the State Engineer in 1 972. Theoe <br />Rules and Regulations state generally that the wells can be pumped on Monday, Tuesday:and <br />Wednesday of each week unless they are cO\lered by a written plan to replace the depletions <br />to the stream. If they are covered by a written plan, they can be operated without ragard to <br />the Rulee and Regulations. Sueh written plana must be approved by the Division Engineer. <br />!-AWMA has developed written plans every year since 1973 to allow its members to operate <br />their wells without regard to the Rules and Regulations, <br /> <br />The suit filed by Kansas in Kansas \I. Colorado involves the allegation that wells <br />developed in Colorildo sinc:e thA Aclnl'ti"n of the Arkansas Riv"r Compact in 1 949 have <br />materially depleted the usable flow in the Arkansas River, A lengthy hearing was conducted <br />before the Special Master in 1 990-92, with the two states disagreeing on this and the other <br />issues involved in the suit, A ruling on Kan:>dS' all~galiuII lIa~ IIul Yilt baan received from <br />either the Special Master or the Supreme Court, The suit has brought about a substantial <br />uncertainty in the prospects for future operation of the wells in the Arkansas River basin, and <br />it is likely that the regulation of the wells will become more stringent reQardless of thA <br />outcome of Kansas v. Colorado. <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.