Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />the overall economy in southeastern Colorado, and water from the irrigation wells makes a <br />very important contribution to it. <br /> <br />The successful implementation of augmentation programs by well user organizations <br />such as LA WMA offers other advantages to the State in addition to the preservation of the <br />agricultural economy. Such augmentation programs will help to simplify and solve complex <br />administrative problems facing the State Engineer in trying to curtail post-compact well <br />pumping. <br /> <br />The 1980 Operating Plan in John Martin Reservoir is important in this feasibility study. <br />A detailed explanation of the operation of John Martin Reservoir under the Arkansas River <br />Compact and the 1980 Operating Plan is not necessary for the understanding of the <br />augmentation program proposed for LAWMA; however, a brief explanation may be helpful to <br />some readers. The Arkansas River Compact provides generally that winter flows and flood <br />flows in the summer are to be stored in conservation storage in John Martin Reservoir. Water <br />users in Water District 67 and Kansas can then, during April through October, make demands <br />for releases of both "river flow" into the reservoir and water from conservation storage, both <br />under certain prescribed limits. During periods when water is contained in conservation <br />storage, the water users in Water District 67 can not make "calls" against the upstream users. <br />Operation under this "common pool" concept, which began officially on May 31,1949 when <br />the Compact became effective, turned out to be quite inefficient. Typically, as soon as one <br />water user demanded water, the other water users also demanded water, else the first water <br />user would have received a larger proportion of water and conceivably could have used the <br />entire supply. Thus, the water users took a large part of the water relatively early in the <br />irrigation season when their irrigation requirements were relatively low or when they could not <br />use the water most efficiently. In many years, conservation storage was exhausted in April <br />or May. Water released from conservation storage was divided among the Water District 67 <br />water users in most years according to percentage distribution agreements that were then in <br />effect. <br /> <br />The 1980 Operating Plan involves a change in this basic mode of operation. Rather <br />than releasing the water from conservation storage to the river for immediate diversion, the <br />water was released into "Article II" Accounts for the Water District 67 ditches and Kansas, <br />with the water being split 60 percent for the Water District 67 ditches and 40 percent for <br /> <br />4 <br />