My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00492
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00492
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:26 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:57:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153364
Contractor Name
Beck, R. W. and Associates
Water District
0
County
Garfield
Bill Number
SB 81-439
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
458
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />4. Proposed Reservoir Operation <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The majority of the annual sediment load of the Colorado River is <br />transported during the spring runoff months of May and June. For example, 67% <br />of the annual sediment load as measured at De Beque for water year 1975 was <br />carried in May and June alone. This was a fairly average year and in a wetter <br />year the effect would be even more pronounced. The fact that flood flows and <br />sediment transport capacities are so markedly seasonal and are coincident with <br />the period of excess water and reservoir refilling, points to a reservoir <br />operation procedure to limit the fOrnlation of a delta which could aggravate <br />flood stages, to a point located approximately one mile or more downstream of <br />the Parachute Bridge. The proposed mode of operation would consist of lower- <br />ing the reservoir in average to wet water years to El 5058 at the beginning of <br />the spring runoff and holding it at this elevation until the peak of the <br />spring hydrograph had passed. As the hydrograph falls the reservoir would be <br />refilled. Sediment that deposits in the reach near Parachute after reservoir <br />refilling and the sedimentation that occurs during the low-flow months would <br />be scoured downstream deeper into the reservoir during drawdown the following <br />spring. A typical inflow-outflow spring hydrograph and reservoir drawdown <br />curve are shown in Fig. II-11, assuming a full reservoir prior to the start of <br />the spring runoff hydrograph. When dry years are forecast, the reservoir <br />would not be drawn down. Any sediment deposition would be scoured downstream <br />in a subsequent wet year. This mode of reservoir operation combined with a <br />runoff forecasting program should prevent significant deltaic deposition in <br />the Parachute area and flood stage aggravation by the Project without any <br />decrease in the potential water yield. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />II-23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.