My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00492
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00492
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:26 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:57:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153364
Contractor Name
Beck, R. W. and Associates
Water District
0
County
Garfield
Bill Number
SB 81-439
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
458
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />II-a <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />,I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I, <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />4. Nat~re and Frequency of Flooding <br /> <br />(11 )(24) <br />Flo)ding along the main stem of the Colorado River is <br />nonnally the l~esult of rapid melting of the mountain snowpack in late May <br />through early July. These snowmelt floods are occasionally augmented by <br />rain. General rainstorms alone and convecti ve-type thunderstorms nonnally <br />have little effect on the Colorado River due to the large size of the drainage <br />basin. <br /> <br />The Colorado River has a long history of snowmelt flooding but for <br />the period prior to initiation of the gaging stations little detailed infor- <br />mation is available. The estimated flood of record, based on high water marks <br />only, occurred in June-July 1884. This flood is estimated at 125,000 cfs at <br />(10) <br />Fruita below the confluence of the Colorado River with the Gunnison <br />River and 50,000 cfs on the Gunnison River at Grand Junction. Based on these <br />estimates, the 1884 flood was probably in the neighborhood of 70,000 cfs at <br />the Una dam sUe. Peak flows recorded at the Cameo gage since 1934 are as <br />shown in Table II-3. <br /> <br />The annual peak flood frequency curve, as computed by the USGS <br />based upon the Cameo gage record and standard Water Resource Council <br />(WRC) (29) guid.~lines, is shown in Fig. II-4. The 100-year and 500-year re- <br />turn period flood peak discharges at the dam site are approximately 39,000 cfs <br />and 44,000 CfE:, respectively. The annual, seasonal, and monthly 5- and <br />10-year return period flood peak discharges at the dam site are shown in <br />Table II-4. The peak flows at the dam site are approximately the same as <br />those measured at the Cameo gage, based on correlation studies of the period <br />of overlapping record (1967-1980). <br /> <br />5. Reservoir Evaporation <br /> <br />Average annual Una Reservoir evaporation was estimated based on <br />infonnation published by the Department of Commerce in Climatic Atlas of the <br />United States, (22) 1968. The annual lake evaporation is approximately 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.