Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />JOHNSON RESERVOIR ALTERNATIVE <br /> <br />The Johnson Reservoir alternative is potentially the best <br />plan available to provide water to Durango West and the <br />surrounding area, including the RV Park and Rafter J. The plan <br />involves utilization of an existing 1,000 acre-foot reservoir <br />about one mile east of Durango West. See Figure IV-2. The two <br />major issues concerning the plan are availability of water to <br />yield the required supply, and the price the reservoir owner <br />would charge to recover his costs in the facility. <br /> <br />The Johnson Reservoir is located on a small, 0.75 square <br />mile, drainage at an excellent location for a reservoir, because <br />there is a large reservoir formed with a small dam. The dam was <br />constructed in about 1980 and is presently full most of the <br />time. The drainage area will only provide about 140 acre-feet <br />of water per year on the average, which is adequate for <br />evaporation and seepage but not to supply Durango West. <br /> <br />The reservoir can also be filled with Pine Ridge Ditch water <br />that is diverted from the La Plata River under a medium priority <br />water right. The owner of the reservoir has 3 CFS of the 14 CFS <br />of the medium priority water in the ditch and 14 CFS of a lower <br />priority water. Durango West also can utilize about 10%, 1.4 <br />CFS, of the water in the Pine Ridge ditch. <br /> <br />An evaluation of the potential inflow to the reservoir was <br />made based upon possible diversions from the La Plata River <br />under the existing administrative restrictions. The general <br />procedure was to compare the Hesperus and Stateline gages and <br />estimate when there was water available for diversion and when <br />there was not. When there was water available, it was assumed <br />that 3 CFS would be diverted to the reservoir, which is a <br />conservative assumption. It was assumed that diversions could <br />be made from April to October. <br /> <br />Table IV-F is a reservoir operation study of Johnson <br />Reservoir. Column 1 is the year and month for the period <br />simulated. Columns 2 is the inflow from the drainage. Column 3 <br />is the inflow to the reservoir from the LaPlata River through <br />the Pine Ridge Ditch. Column 4 is the water demand and Column 5 <br />is other losses such as evaporation and seepage. Column 6 is <br />the end-of-month content of the reservoir. Column 7 is the <br />spill from the reservoir. The per iod 1975 to 1980 was used <br />because it represents a severe shortage period. The results <br />showed that there was adequate water to serve Durango West and <br />the RV Park, if included, without shortages. <br /> <br />(1 ) <br />Pine <br /> <br />The water supply <br />it does not include <br />Ridge Ditch that <br /> <br />is believed to be conservative because: <br />runoff collected from the area above the <br />is not a diversion from the La Plata <br /> <br />- 24 - <br />