Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(b) Assumption A, inflow design flood, thunderstorm <br />rainfall <br /> <br />(1) From Figure 24, Page 58, reduction ratio is 6 or <br />multiply by O. 167 <br /> <br /><'i. <br /> <br />Time <br />Ending, Hr. <br /> <br />Probable Max. <br />Thundersrprm <br />Rainfall, .. in. <br /> <br />Accum. <br />Reduce~ <br />Rainfall, in. <br /> <br />Assumption A Design Storm <br /> <br />Accum. rainfall3 Incremental <br />in. Rainfall, in. <br /> <br /> 0.25 1.34 0.22 O. 78 0.78 <br /> 0.50 3.24 0.54 1.89 1.11 <br /> 0.75 5.80 0.97 3.39 1.50 <br /> 1.00 11. 16 1.86 6.51 3.12 <br /> 1.25 12.28 2.05 7.17 0.66 <br /> 1.50 13.06 2.18 7.62 0.45 <br /> 1.75 13.62 2.27 7.95 0.33 <br /> 2.00 14.06 2.34 8.20 0.25 <br /> 2.25 14.40 2.40 8.40 0.20 <br />. -~ 2.50 14.68 2.45 _ 8.57 0.17 <br />.J 2.75 14.84 2.47 8.66 0.09 <br />.,j <br /> 3.00 14.95 2.49 8. 72 0.06 <br />,--:~~" ., <br />.: ..' ~.;. <br />.'"" <br /> 1 From Step 8, Column 3 <br /> 2 Design arrangement accumulative PMP multiplied by O. 167 <br /> <br />3 Average of values, Columns 2 and 3 <br /> <br />(2) Obtain thunderstorm runoff curve number, CN, <br />from Table A-9, Appendix A, Page 544 <br /> <br />Cover type: Brush, sage, grass or combinations,. <br />cover density at ground surface - 50% or less, Zone III, <br />Assumption A thunderstorm. eN is 85 so from Table 5, <br />Page 67 no adjustment in T is necessary. <br />c <br /> <br />- 15 - <br />