Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> TABLE 5.3 <br /> Project Costs <br /> Representative Project - Four Water Supply Scenarios <br /> Fil"ll Un"l ~~ Construction Capital Investment Reservoli) Dill <br /> Yiel~P) cos~ 2) Cost Cost Cost Storage Height <br />Scenario (af) (S/af/vr) (S1000) (S1OOO) (S1000) (S1000) (af) ....illL <br />AS 26,000 1,262 33,000 274,000 338,000 377,000 180,000 494 <br />ASX 38,700 935 36,000 309,000 375,000 419,000 175,000 489 <br />BAM 43,200 843 37,000 311,000 385,000 429,000 230,000 540 <br />Be 61,000 631 39,000 330,000 400,000 447,000 189,000 502 <br /> <br />--' <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />The most cost-efficient highway relocation alternative is Alternative <br />No.6. <br />The best reservoir size for each of the three highest-yielding water <br />supply scenarios is the size that produces both maximum yield and <br />minimum unit cost of firm yield. This is the "maximum required <br />reservoir capacity" for each scenario, as shown in Table 5.3. <br />The project would provide benefits in addition to water supply. These <br />benefits might accrue to either the All iance or to the regional economy, <br />and could include recreation, improved water quality, hydropower, flood <br />control, and enhancement of the local economy. <br /> <br />--' <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />'--' <br /> <br />'-- <br /> <br />, <br />- <br /> <br />(1)Maximum firm yield which can be developed for each scenario. <br />(2)Includes annual debt service plus operation and maintenance per acre-foot of firm yield. <br />(3)Includes annual debt service plus operation and maintenance. <br />(4)Storage required to deveLop maximum firm yield; figure includes 30,000 af for recreation pool. <br /> <br />..... <br /> <br />i <br />'- <br /> <br />i ' <br /> <br />5-6 <br />