Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />TABLE OF CONTENTS <br />(CONTINUED) <br /> <br />8.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................... 45 <br /> <br />8.1 Conclusions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 45 <br />8.2 Recommendations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 45 <br /> <br />8.3 Closures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 46 <br /> <br />9.0 GLOSSARY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 49 <br /> <br />10.0 REFERENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 49 <br /> <br />liST OF TABLES <br /> <br />TABLE 3.1 - PlATEAU CREEK FLOW CHARAcrERISTICS <br />TABLE 3.2 - COLORADO RIVER FLOW CHARAcrERISTICS <br />TABLE 5.1- PlATEAU TUNNEL ALTERNATIVE A COST COMPARISONS <br />TABLE 5.2 - PlATEAU TUNNEL ALTERNATIVE B COST COMPARISONS <br />TABLE 6.1 - SUMMARY OF SPECIAL CONDmONS FOR NATIONWIDE GENERAL <br />PERMIT <br />TABLE 6.2 - COST ESTIMATE PIPELINE ALTERNATIVE <br />TABLE 7.1- LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS. PlATEAU CREEK PROJECf <br />TABLE 7.2 - COMPARATIVE EVALUATION RATING SYSTEM <br />TABLE 73 - COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />LIST OF FIGURES <br /> <br />FIGURE 2.1 - <br />FIGURE 3.1 - <br />FIGURE3.2- <br />FIGURE33- <br />FIGURE 5.1 - <br />FIGURE 5.2 - <br /> <br />UTE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICf FACILITIES <br />SITE LOCATION PIAN <br />PROPERTY OWNERSHIP MAP <br />REGIONAL GEOLOGICAL MAP <br />PIAN VIEWS OF ALTERNATIVE TUNNEL LOCATIONS <br />GROUND SURFACE PROFILE AT TUNNEL ALTERNATIVE <br />ALIGNMENT A <br />