My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00455
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00455
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:26 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:56:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153583
Contractor Name
Ute Water Conservancy District
Water District
0
Bill Number
XB 99-999
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />pipeline on the west side. Costs were based on an approximate tunnel length of 3050 feet. The <br />major difference between alternatives I and III is that the pipe for alternative III is backfilled with <br />soil for stability and protection, whereas the pipe for alternative I is supported on pipe cradles or <br />supports. The granular backfill surrounding the pipe in alternative III will have a greater degree of <br />protection from freezing conditions and other environmental effects. To account for these <br />conditions, weatherproof doors have been added to the cost of alternative I, and it has been <br />assumed conservatively that the pipe will be coated every 2 years. Alternative I has the advantage <br />that the pipe can be inspected routinely, whereas alternative III is buried and cannot be visually <br />inspected. <br /> <br />Excavation of the tunnel is expected to require approximately 8 months. The backfill and steel pipe <br />for alternatives I and III could be installed in approximately 1 to 2 months whereas the concrete <br />pipe would likely require 2 to 3 months for installation. Excavation of the tunnel will have to be <br />completed before construction of the pipeline can begin. Therefore, the minimum construction <br />time is expected to be 9 to 12 months without a winter shutdown. <br /> <br />The cost comparisons were based on the following facts: <br /> <br />Tunnel Excavation - The tunnel for all alternatives was assumed to be eight feet high and <br />seven feet wide. These dimensions correspond to convenient dimensions for tunnel <br />excavation and a practical work area. Costs for tunnel excavation are based on estimates <br />from similar construction by contractors in Colorado and for excavation in good dry ground. <br /> <br />Steel Pipe - All steel pipe was assumed to be capable of withstanding a pressure head of at <br />least 200 feet of water (87 psi). The steel pipe can have either push-on joints with o-rings, <br />or welded joints. Material costs for the pipe do not vary significantly for the two types of <br />joints. However, the welded pipe is expected to be more expensive to install in the tunnel. <br />Costs are based on welded connections for the steel pipe. <br /> <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.