Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Feasibility Report for Dam Safety Modifications to DeWeese Dam <br />April 22, 1997 <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />Reinforcing bar dowels should be drilled and grouted into the original dam section as a second <br />line of defense for sliding stability of the dam. <br /> <br />The new crest section most likely would be placed in one full-height lift using conventional, air- <br />entrained concrete, For construction and thermal cracking considerations, the new crest section <br />is expected to be constructed in 20- to 40-foot-long blocks, All vertical construction joints <br />would be keyed and include a conventional PVC waterstop, Concrete mix design requirements <br />would be included to provide durable concrete with minimal potential for thermal cracking. <br /> <br />Handrails <br /> <br />Handrails should be included on both the upstream and downstream sides of the crest to improve <br />crest access safety at the dam. <br /> <br />3.4 ALTERNATWE NO.2 - CREST REHABILITATION <br /> <br />Alternative No, 2 consists of removing all unsound concrete from the existing crest section, <br />installation of passive anchors, and construction of a new concrete cap section, The amount of <br />concrete that must be removed from the exterior surfaces of the existing crest section is not <br />known and would have to be a field engineering decision. The new cap section would be <br />constructed to match the geometry of the existing crest raise sections, A drainage/seepage <br />control system would be installed within the cap concrete, and would be similar to that for <br />Alternative No,l, <br /> <br />If performed correctly, removal of the deteriorated concrete from the existing crest section will <br />address the dam safety issues regarding deterioration of the existing concrete, The rehabilitated <br />crest section would provide adequate factors of safety under all expected loading conditions, <br />assuming installation of the passive reinforcement anchors in conjunction with a properly <br />functioning drainage/seepage control system, Stability requirements of the SEO would be fully <br />met by Alternative No 2. <br /> <br />Details of the proposed crest rehabilitation alternative are shown on Figure 6 and include the <br />following components: <br /> <br />Demolition <br /> <br />Demolition and removal of all of the unsound concrete from both faces and the top surface of <br />the existing crest raise sections would be the first step in construction of Alternative No.2. <br />Techniques for removal of the unsound concrete for this rehabilitation alternative would be quite <br />different from those used for the replacement alternative and would be expected to be very labor <br /> <br />96006\REPORTS\FEAS\TEXT.NEW <br /> <br />~ GEl Consultants, Inc. <br />