Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Cherry Creek that encompasses approximately 20 square miles upstream of the <br />proposed dam axis. <br /> <br />Based on data generated from the preliminary dam design, this reservoir site can <br />accommodate an approximate 14, 300 acre-foot (ac-ft) reservoir that will be used to <br />meet the needs of the District. The District has currently purchased 2240 acres which <br />includes the dam axis, the reservoir area, spillway area, and land for ancillary facilities. <br /> <br />There are several ancillary facilities that will also be completed on the reservoir site and <br />between the reservoir site and Cherry Creek to divert Cherry Creek flows into Rueter- <br />Hess Reservoir. Since Rueter-Hess Reservoir will store raw water, a water treatment <br />plant is planned near the northeast corner of the reservoir site. This water treatment <br />plant will process raw water from the reservoir, and then deliver these potable supplies <br />into the District's distribution system. <br /> <br />Water will be delivered to Rueter-Hess Reservoir from Cherry Creek by a surface-water <br />and ground water diversion system. The alluvial wells, diversion structures, pumps and <br />pipelines are described below as the points of diversion for the water rights adjudicated <br />on Cherry Creek. <br /> <br />Hydrology, Water Rights and Alternative Projects <br /> <br />In 1985, John C. Halepaska and Associates, Inc. (JCHA), as the hydrologic consultant <br />to the District, prepared a report which showed that the District would face a 3,000 ac-ft <br />shortfall at ultimate development based on the then-current District master plan, and the <br />District's then adjudicated water rights. That report set in motion a series of studies <br />which has resulted in the development of Rueter-Hess Reservoir. <br /> <br />To evaluate how the District could overcome its water supply shortfall, JCHA did a <br />subsequent study on various water supply alternatives. One of these alternatives was <br />to build an upstream storage vessel on Cherry Creek that would capture in-priority <br />Cherry Creek flows. This study identified three potential reservoir sites that could <br />provide an average annual yield between 2,100 and 2,800 ac-fUyr. <br /> <br />Once the District identified these three potential upstream reservoir sites, the District <br />filed for water storage rights in Division 1 Water Court in Case No. 85CW448. This <br />case sought the right to store water in any of the sites identified in the JCHA 1985 <br />study. <br /> <br />Given the potential yields from upstream reservoirs on Cherry Creek, the district <br />pursued additional studies of these reservoir sites through the Colorado Water <br />Resources and Power Development Authority (Authority). This project was funded by <br />the Authority, and Morrison Knudsen Engineers conducted studies related to the <br />economical and technical viability of upstream reservoirs on Cherry Creek, as well as <br />other imported water supply options. This study was completed in 1987, and the site of <br /> <br />Parker Water & Sanitation District <br />Rueter-Hess Reservoir Feasibiiity Study <br />August 2001 <br /> <br />Page 7 of 13 <br /> <br />J <br />