My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00441
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00441
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:25 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:55:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153459
Contractor Name
Loveland, City of
Water District
0
County
Larimer
Bill Number
XB 99-999
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />4.3.1 Hydrologic Data Used in Augmentation Process <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Precipitation and streamflow from other areas were examined to determine if <br />long-term historical records existed which could be correlated with the Big <br />Thompson native flows for augmentation purposes. The records used in this <br />analysis included monthly native flows of the Cache La Poudre River and <br />monthly precipitation data collected at the Vaterdale Treatment Plant (in <br />Loveland); Fraser, Colorado; and Grand Lake, Colorado weather stations. <br />Only data recorded concurrently with the Big Thompson native flows and <br />which were also available for periods when Big Thompson flow data were <br />missing were considered. The selected records were sufficient in length to <br />generate a 58-year historical record of Big Thompson River native flows for <br />the period 1927 to 1984 (calendar year). <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Precipitation records for the three weather stations mentioned previously <br />were selected due to their length of record and possibility of <br />demonstrating good correlation to Big Thompson native flows. Records from <br />the Waterdale station should reflect precipitation that has fallen in the <br />Big Thompson watershed, and thus streamflow as a result of precipitation, <br />although they will not necessarily correlate to spring runoff as a result <br />of snowmelt. Runoff resulting from winter snowfall may be better <br />represented by precipitation records from high mountain weather stations. <br />The station located near Estes Park would have been the obvious candidate <br />for this analysis, however, its location has been changed at times and its <br />use is generally not considered appropriate for long-term record analyses. <br />The Grand Lake and Fraser stations are located on Colorado's Western Slope <br />near the Continental Divide. These were the nearest high mountain stations <br />to the Big Thompson watershed for which records were available. Runoff <br />resulting from melting of winter snowfall are more adequately represented <br />by these stations than the Waterdale station. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />4-6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.