My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00434
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00434
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:03:44 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:55:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153337
Contractor Name
Farmers Extension Ditch & Highland Lake Lateral Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
1
County
Weld
Bill Number
FSA
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />will be addressed later in this report. <br /> <br />Another problem with the metering gates is that there are times when it is im- <br /> <br />possible to deliver the desired amount of water to a stockholder because of the <br /> <br /> <br />height at which the gate was set. There are usually two, three or more metering <br /> <br />gates behind each check structure. The ditch rider has done a good job learning <br /> <br /> <br />the height at which the check structure needs to be set to deliver the proper <br /> <br />amount of water. There are time, though, when more than one of the farmers <br /> <br />whose meter gate is behind the same check structure has to have a certain amount <br /> <br /> <br />of water delivered at the same time on the same day. At these times, it is im- <br /> <br />possible to deliver the required flow to at least one of the farmers since the <br /> <br /> <br />elevation and size of gates and their relative location are not exactly right <br /> <br /> <br />for the amount of water requested. <br /> <br />We recommend for the problem of excessive silt and trash buildup within the metering <br /> <br /> <br />gates, that a regular maintenance program be set up so that the gates can be in- <br /> <br />spected on a regular basis. We recommend that the gates be check individually <br /> <br />every two (2) weeks for silt buildup and trash accumulation. Should excessive <br /> <br /> <br />silt be found at the bottom of the gates, then they should be cleaned thoroughly. <br /> <br /> <br />Excessive silt, we feel, is when the silt is built up so that it, in any way, <br /> <br />blocks the small inlet pipe to the measuring ports. This is also shown in Ex- <br /> <br />hibit 2. <br /> <br />We also recommend that when new metering gates are installed, flow requirements <br /> <br />be estimated for each gate so that the new gates can be installed at the proper <br /> <br />height and will have new flow pipe of the proper diameter. A way to avoid the <br /> <br />problem of height setting is to use an alternative measuring device, a Parshall <br /> <br />Flume. The Parshall Flume is used considerably in Colorado. A Parshall Flume <br /> <br />is a specially built channel which forces water through a defined cross sectional <br /> <br /> <br />area. One is able to directly measure the height of the water at a point where <br /> <br /> <br />the cross sectional area is known and then obtain the flow through the flume by <br /> <br />using a height-discharge graph supplied by the designer or manufacturer. This <br /> <br /> <br />type of measuring device is very accurate, but more expensive to install than a <br /> <br />measuring gate. It is easier to keep clean of trash and silts because it is an <br /> <br />open channel and not a closed conduit. We recommend the use of Parshall Flumes <br /> <br /> <br />over metering gates if funds are available. <br /> <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.