My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00427
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00427
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:25 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:54:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
FS0028X
Contractor Name
Avery Lake USBR 1976
Contract Type
Miscellaneous
Water District
0
County
Rio Blanco
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CHAPTER IV <br /> <br />PLAN FORMULATION <br /> <br />Potential Reservoir Sites <br /> <br />During previous studies and the present MOP planning, numerous reser- <br />voir sites have been considered. Of these, nine are still under con- <br />sideration and could be incorporated into the final project plan. The <br />pros and cons and possible uses of the nine storage sites are discussed <br />here. A map showing the location of these reservoir sites is on the <br />next page. <br /> <br />Ripple site <br /> <br />> <br /> <br />The Ripple Reservoir site lies on the North Fork of the White River <br />upstream from the mouth of Ripple Creek at an elevation of about 8,500 <br />feet. It is on private land but within the boundaries of White River <br />National Forest. A capacity of 20,000 acre-feet has been estimated as <br />ideal for a reservoir at this site. The reservoir could serve irriga- <br />tion, municipal, and industrial water needs in the White River Valley. <br />A visually attractive lake could be developed at the site, and because <br />of its high elevation wildlife habitat losses would be slight. Good <br />access to the site would be provided by the present Colorado Highway <br />132. <br /> <br />The Rio Blanco Ranch Company, which owns the site, is unalterably <br />opposed to its development. Because it is adjacent to the recently estab- <br />lished White River Wilderness Area, Forest Service personnel believe it <br />would hinder their management program. Fishery releases recommended by <br />the Fish and Wildlife Service would reduce the potential storage effi- <br />ciency. A dam at this site would be comparatively expensive as the dam <br />axis is wide. About 2 miles of privately-owned trout stream would be <br />inundated. <br /> <br />.'~ <br /> <br />Lost Park site <br /> <br />/ <br /> <br />The Lost Park Reservoir site is located within the White River <br />National Forest on Lost Creek about 4 miles upstream from its confluence <br />with the North Fork. A reservoir at this site would have a potential <br />capacity of about 25,000 acre-feet. Because of inadequate runoff in <br />that drainage basin, however, water would have to be imported from the <br />Williams Fork drainage to achieve that capacity. The reservoir basin is <br />a broad open park, and the dam would only be about 115 feet high. A <br />reservoir at this site would serve the same purposes as one at the Ripple <br />Site. <br /> <br />Objections to this site have been raised by Forest Service personnel <br />and wildlife interests. At an elevation of 8,~00 feet, this site is not <br />in wildlife winter range but is heavily used in summer and is near an <br />important elk-calving ground. Access to the site is difficult, and a ne,' <br />road across National Forest land would be necessary. The Forest Service <br /> <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.