Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CHAPTER II <br /> <br />I <br />" <br /> <br />i <br />'1 <br /> <br />Fish and Wildlife and Recre~ <br /> <br /> <br />The following chaptj <br />implemented to meet all ( <br />ect area. To avoid repel <br />generally applicable to ~ <br />I <br />The project area iSI <br />Danforth Hills and other! <br />purposes of project plaru <br />as the Milk Creek Segmen! <br />rnent, consisting simply i <br />small and is not further; <br />hand, consists of sever~ <br />are three areas mention~ <br />Creek, and Josephine Bas <br />in the White River SegmEi <br />coal developments would <br />Beaver area, and all mun _cil <br />considered is in the Little <br />the General Map in the front <br /> <br />Excellent hunting and fishing in the White <br />nonconsumptive enjoyment of the abundant wildlif <br />every State and from foreign countries. Many Ie <br />income by providing accommodations, goods, and E <br />sportsmen. <br /> <br />There are demands to improve and preserve t <br />fish and wildlife resources in the project area. <br />serve and improve big game winter ranges and to <br />routes. Civilization is continuing to encroach <br />itat,and critical big game winter range is grade <br />in value by expanding agricultural, industrial, <br />There is pressure to set aside lands in the vic! <br />Avery and along the White River's South Fork for <br />vation and improvement. Preservation of riparia <br />to maintain the diversity of game and nongame sp <br />area. <br /> <br />In accordance with tl <br />and Related Land Resource <br />studies described in thi <br />planning (MOP) procedurj <br />enhancement were recognJ <br />, <br />although it was considel <br />are justified in terms , <br />public viewpoints in thi <br />of an interdisciplinary, <br />of Reclamation. Public <br />has been used. <br /> <br />The fishery needs in the proj ec t area are n <br />time. Preservation of the existing high-quality <br />the major problems facing the area. Public use <br />ery of the White River above Meeker is limited b <br />vate lands bordering the stream, especially alon <br />South Fork, and the mainstem above Meeker. This <br />acute in the future as urbanization spreads alon <br />possible to improve the fishing or to extend gam <br />stream by supplementing the low flows and contro <br />flows, by improving water quality and temperatur <br />public access to the stream. The present poor f <br />be upgraded by increasing the low flows and impr <br /> <br />There is a need to maintain or improve the <br />fishes in the Green and Yampa Rivers, of which t <br />Creek, respectively, are tributaries. More data <br />the extent of such fish and their actual habitat <br /> <br />I <br />When the present ~ <br />1975, a public meeting! <br />including the local pe~ <br />needs and resources of ! <br />were outlined. An MOP I <br />in the course of the st <br />The people on the team epJ <br /> <br />The pattern of continually increasing water <br />tion in the West seems likely to continue. Alth <br />areas do meet most of the current recreation dell' <br />to be the case in the future. The demand in the <br />ing to grow at an accelerating rate while the su <br />tively constant. The demand will increase even <br />influxes with expanding industrial development 0 <br />Upper Colorado Region Comprehensive Framework St <br />ing need for additional water-based recreation 0 <br />central portion of Colorado. Potential water-ba <br />this area include boating, canoeing, waterskiing <br />the assocated activities such as camping, picnic <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />; <br />