Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />HORSE CREEK BASIN WATER RIGHTS ADMINISTRATION <br /> <br />In January of 1969, Box Springs requested that the State Engineer discontinue the <br />issuance of well permits in the basin. Box Springs notified the State Engineer's office in <br />January of 1973 concerning junior and possibly illegal upstream diversions that were <br />affecting Horse Creek streamflow. Later that year in December, Box Springs placed a call <br />for water on the entire upper basin. <br /> <br />In 1976, Smith Cattle Company requested that the pumping from the Preisser wells <br />(located in upper Horse Creek basin) be curtailed. In response, the Division Engineer <br />ordered that the Arkansas River Rules and Regulations be applied such that pumping would <br />be curtailed to three days per week, In 1977, the Division Engineer reversed his decision <br />to use the Arkansas River Rules and ordered strict priority administration of the Preisser <br />wells. Priority administration remained until 1981 when the Division Engineer applied <br />Arkansas River Rules and rescinded strict priority administration. The administration efforts <br />have not been successful in resolving the controversies among the basin water users. <br /> <br />In 1987, the Water Court determined that the Arkansas River Rules do not apply <br />to the Preisser wells. This judgment was appealed to the Colorado Supreme Court by the <br />State Engineer. The Colorado Supreme Court affirmed the judgment.7 <br /> <br />On August 3D, 1988, the Water Court in Case No, 86CW91 ordered the State <br />Engineer to prepare a proposed plan for administration of the Horse Creek basin water <br />rights. Pursuant to the Court's order, the State filed its Horse Creek Basin Study in March <br />1989. In accordance with the Court's December 7, 1989 order, the State filed its Horse <br />Creek Basin Study Phase I in March 1990. <br /> <br />In 1990, the Water Court in Case No. 86CW91 ruled that illegal wells be curtailed <br />prior to any administration of junior decreed wells. This ruling was affirmed by the <br /> <br />7State Engineer v. Smith Cattle Co., Inc., 780 P.2d 546 (Colo. 1989). <br /> <br />11 <br />