My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00414
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00414
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:24 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:54:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153326
Contractor Name
Fruitland Mesa Water Conservancy District
Contract Type
Grant
Water District
0
County
Montrose
Bill Number
XB 99-999
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The conclusions drawn from the study are summarized as follows: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1. The ideal water requirement for irrigation in the project <br /> <br /> <br />area is 21,800 acre feet annually. Presently, a shortage of <br /> <br /> <br />about 33 percent of irrigation has been reported by the irriga- <br /> <br /> <br />tors. Based on this reported figure the annual amount of short- <br /> <br /> <br />age in the system is estimated to be about 7,200 acre feet. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />2. The results of the simulated reservoir operation study for a <br />continuous period of 25 years (1941-1965) show that with the <br />existing live storage capacity (8,000 acre feet) of Gould Reser- <br />voir (1) by routing all flows including the Cattleman's Ditch and <br />the Fruitland Mesa Ditch through the reservoir storage, and (2) <br />by using return flows collected from the service areas within the <br />system, the amount of average annual shortage over the period of <br />study would be about 4,030 acre feet. The irrigation firmness in <br />the project areas would vary from a minimum of 52.8 percent in <br />areas above the reservoir to 87.2 percent in areas below the <br />reservoir. This condition of water shortage being less than that <br />presently reported by the irrigators could be achieved without <br />enlarging the size of the reservoir but by adjusting the convey- <br />ance and the diversion system, storing all water from above the <br />reservoir and then releasing it on demand for areas below the <br />reservoir. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3. By raising the height of the dam by about 12 feet and thereby <br /> <br /> <br />increasing the storage capacity of the reservoir to 12,000 acre <br /> <br /> <br />feet, the average annual shortage in the system would reduce from <br /> <br /> <br />4,030 acre feet under conditions of (2) above to 2,240 acre feet. <br /> <br /> <br />The shortage that would be eliminated in this case is the criti- <br /> <br /> <br />cal shortage presently occurring during the latter part of the <br /> <br /> <br />irrigation season. Consequently, the irrigation firmness in <br /> <br /> <br />areas below Gould Reservoir would improve considerably. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.