Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The right abutment at the dam site is composed of massive sand- <br />stones overlying thin, interbedded sandstones and shale. The attitude <br />of the massive sandstone just upstream of the right abutment is N <br />370E, 380SE with a prominent joint at N 370E, 50"Nw. The interbedded <br />gray and red sandstones and sandy shales have an attitude of N 700E, <br />420SE and a prominent joint at N 250E, 75"Nw to vertical. The exposed <br />beds at the right abutment contact of the existing dam are composed of <br />good quality rock. The steep upstream dip of the formations are ideal <br />for stability and seepage control. The seepage control is assumed to <br />be favorable because any seepage along the bedding would have to cross <br />all the interbeds, and cross joints do not appear to be continuous. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Conditions at the left abutment are less favorable than those at <br /> <br /> <br />the right abutment. The left abutment is composed of thin interbedded <br /> <br /> <br />sandstones and shales. The massive Dakota sandstone capping the right <br /> <br /> <br />abutment is largely absent from the left abutment as the sandstone <br /> <br /> <br />appears to thin out abruptly. The dip of the interbedded sandstones <br /> <br /> <br />and shales on the left abutment is about 40oSE, which is also favor- <br /> <br /> <br />able from the standpoint of stability and seepage control. The <br /> <br /> <br />thinness of the beds, however, results in a higher potential for <br /> <br /> <br />seepage through cross joints although no seepage was noted along <br /> <br /> <br />either abutment contact. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Geotechnical Investigations - General <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Due to the time and budget constraints imposed on this study, a <br />detailed field exploration program to investigate the embankments and <br />their foundations was not possible. Since five borings were drilled <br />into the dam and foundation by the Water and Power Resources Service <br />(formerly U.S. Bureau of Reclamation) in 1956, it was decided that the <br />present efforts should be concentrated on investigating potential <br />borrow areas to define the quantity and quality of available construc- <br />tion materials while the previous borings would be evaluated to arrive <br />at assumptions concerning embankment materials' and foundation condi- <br />t ions, which were required in designing the scheme for raising the <br />existing embankments. Field investigations were limited, therefore, <br />to the following: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />II-6 <br />