Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />I, :J <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Triaxial Compression Test <br /> <br />A triaxial compression teGt was conducted on a remolded <br /> <br />sample received in our laboratoiY. <br /> <br />The test was performed <br /> <br />consolidated undrained with pore pressure measurements. <br /> <br />The <br /> <br />inte:rpreted failure of the sample, for our analysis, was <br /> <br />taken at a strain of about 5 percent. The triaxial cornp+ession <br /> <br />test results are presented on Figure A3. <br /> <br />A2 <br />M85l31GE <br /> <br />1Lambert anti g.6'.6'ociate.6' <br /> <br />CONSUL liNG GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS AND <br />MATERIAL TESTING <br />