Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3.3 Outlet Works <br /> <br />Foll owi ng a revi ew of the hydraul i cs of the exi sti ng outl et works, three <br />criteria were evaluated. These included: <br /> <br />1) The capacity of the outlet works to release the maximum five <br />feet of reservoir storage at a rate of one foot per day, <br /> <br />2) The out1 et capacity requi red to insure the current reservoi r <br />operating restriction will be maintained, and <br /> <br />3) The outlet capacity with regard to the normal flow. <br /> <br />The mai n outl et works di scharge rati ng curve, as developed by Nel son, Haley, <br />Patterson and Quirk for the 1973 dam modifications, was reviewed and found to <br />be acceptable. <br /> <br />The SEO requires that the outlet works have the emergency capacity to release <br />the maximum five feet of reservoir storage at a rate of one foot per day. The <br />net storage in the five feet below the normal water surface elevation of 9087 <br />(G.H. 40.0) is approximately 523 acre-feet. From the revised outlet <br />stage-discharge curve, at an average elevation of 9084.5 (G.H. 37.5), the <br />computed discharge is 155 cfs. This is equivalent to a volume of 1,537 <br />acre-feet for a five-day peri od. Therefore, the out1 et works is capab1 e of <br />discharging the maximum five feet of storage in less than five days, assuming <br />there is no additional inflow into the l'eservoir. <br /> <br />Barnes Meadow Reservoi r is currently restri cted to a maximum water surface <br />elevation of 9083 (G.H. 36). This elevation corresponds to an outlet works <br />di scharge capaci ty of 152 cfs. Although no di scharge measurements have been <br />made at Barnes Meadow Reservoi r, measurements are avail abl e at a gaged si te <br />representing a similar basin. USGS discharge measurements at Fall Creek, near <br />Rustic, are available for the period 1961-1973. The measurements were <br />adjusted to reflect the slightly different drainage areas. Review of these <br /> <br />1231 H <br /> <br />-64- <br />