My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00387
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00387
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:20:26 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:52:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153386
Contractor Name
San Luis Valley Irrigation District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
20
County
Hinsdale
Bill Number
SB 82-87
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />PROJECT EVALUATION <br /> <br />In order to estimate the ability of the SLVID farmers to repay an <br />advance received from the State of Colorado through the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board, information was obtained from the following <br /> <br />sources: <br />1. "Colorado Agricultural Statistics." <br />2. 1974-1980 "Management Trends and Profits - Farm Business <br />Analysis" by San Luis Valley Farm and Ranch Management <br />Association. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />Interviews with the following individuals: <br />a. Don Perkins - superintendent SLVID <br />b. Bill Kopfman - President SLVID and local farmer <br />c. Don Schultz - production Credit Association, Monte <br />Vista <br />d. Tom Amerman - united States Department of Agriculture, <br />Farmers Home Administration, Monte Vista <br />e. Don Moschetti, local farmer and member of Colorado <br />Agricultural Commission <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4. Production cost estimates by Duane Steinhart, Extension <br />Agent Farm Management from Bulletin 490A "Costs for <br />Selected Crops in a Closed Basin, San Luis Valley, Colorado." <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Generally speaking, production costs have increased at a faster <br />rate than crop income. From 1970 to 1979 cash expenses have increased <br />by a factor of 2.44 while cash income has only increased by a factor <br />of 2.08. In 1980, the prices (eceived by farmers increased signifi- <br />cantly. Comparing 1979 with 1980, the price received for barley <br />increased 19 percent, the price received for hay increased 21 percent, <br />and the price received for potatoes increased 74 percent. Because of <br />the fluctuating prices received by the farmers, it is difficult to <br />project repayment ability over a long period of time. The price <br />received for potatoes has remained about the same during 1981 as it <br />was during 1980, such that 1981 is also predicted as a relatively very <br /> <br />-54- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.