My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00387
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00387
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:20:26 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:52:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153386
Contractor Name
San Luis Valley Irrigation District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
20
County
Hinsdale
Bill Number
SB 82-87
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />would be incurred for care of water during the outlet works repair <br />and for 'construction of an access road to the dam toe. <br />The opinion of probable construction cost for Alternate B is <br />shown in Table 12. The total cost for Alternate B would be about <br />$1,040,000 including engineering, contingencies, and cost escalation to <br />1983. The cost for outlet works repair, access road construction, <br />and the monitoring program would be about the same as in Alternate A. <br />The major cost included in Alternate B would be related to construc- <br />tion of the dam enlargement and protection of the dam toe. <br />Consideration was given to the use of reinforced earth along the <br />existing dam crest. A six foot high reinforced earth crest would <br />allow the one-half probable maximum flood to be contained at a sub- <br />stantially lower cost. However, the additional weight on the exist- <br />ing dam crest could result in instability problems along the down- <br />stream face of the dam. Since there is uncertainty about the geotech- <br />nical feasibility of using reinforced earth, it is our opinion that <br />the higher costs of dam enlargement should be used for planning <br />purposes. Prior to final design of the dam enlargement, analysis of <br />information gathered through the dam monitoring program should indi- <br />cate whether reinforced earth can be used. <br />A cost estimate was made to determine whether spillway enlarge- <br />ment would be more economical than the dam enlargement for Alternate <br />B. The required spillway would be similar to the spillway enlargement <br />under Alternate C. Costs for spillway excavation and concrete place- <br />ment would increase total construction costs to about $3,800,000. <br />Therefore, it is recommended that the spillway should not be modified <br />under Alternate B. <br />The opinion of probable construction cost for Alternate C is <br />shown in Table 13. The total cost for Alternate C would be about <br />$5,590,000, including engineering, contingencies, and cost escalation <br />to 1983. Over half of the total cost would be related to installation <br />of the concrete floor and walls for the spillway. The concrete unit <br />cost was estimated to be $525 per cubic yard plus future cost escala- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />tion. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-52- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.