My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00354
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00354
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2010 11:10:52 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:51:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153754
Contractor Name
Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District
Contract Type
Grant
Water District
0
County
Lake
Chaffee
Fremont
Pueblo
El Paso
Bill Number
SB 99-173, SB 96-170
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Draft Water and Storage Needs Assessment <br />SECWCDI Assessment Enterprise <br />iv September 23,1998 <br /> <br /> <br />Fry-Ark Project Reoperation <br />Pueblo Reservoir Enlargement <br />lake Meredith Enlargement <br />Turquoise Lake Enlargement <br />Clear Creek Reservoir (New) <br /> <br />~'!:i;;:;~i;i~"JlI'r!I;!;li;!iL'H: <br /> <br />90,000(21 <br /> <br />, 75,000 <br /> <br />80,000 <br /> <br />9,000 <br /> <br />100,000 <br /> <br />28,000 <br /> <br />16,000 ' <br />(additional to 12,000 af planned by <br />Colorado Springs) <br /> <br />13,000 <br />(with potential for more in future) <br /> <br />Tennessee Creek Reservoir <br /> <br />WiJliams Creek Reservoir <br /> <br />Gravel Lakes Storage <br /> <br />(1) Estimated maximum volume of storage based on initial configurations. <br />(2) Estimated potential volume available withouf consideration of East Slope decrees. . Volume may not be available <br />In all yea",. <br /> <br />Various combinations of these options should be evaluated in greater detail to identify a <br />preferred plan and several alternatives for evaluation during compliance with requirements of <br />the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Storage costs are estimated to range from $150 <br />per af ~Turquoise Enlargement) to $3,000 per af (Gravel Lakes Storage), Depending on how <br />storage options are combined, total costs to develop 159,000 af of additional storage could range <br />from $34 to $ I 74 million, The lower cost is heavily dependent on whether "reoperation" can <br />be technically and legally accomplished or whether all of the storage must be developed in new <br />or enlarged reservoirs, <br /> <br />In summary, municipal water demands, primarily developing in the Fountain VaHey area <br />(Colorado Springs, Fountain Security, Widefield, and Stratmoor Hills) of the District, will <br />require development of additional water storage capacity, Coupled with dedicated storage for <br />the Winter Water Program and other potential partners, the storage need will range from 65,000 <br />to 159,000 af. The need will begin to develop over the next 10 to 20 years, Therefore, studies <br />should be initiated in the near future to further evaluate alternative storage options in terms of <br />technical and environmental performance, <br /> <br />Reoperation of Fry-Ark Project storage is likely to be an important element of an overall water <br />management strategy, Coupled with possibilities for enlarging Project reservoirs, this means that <br />detailed discussions with the Bureau of Reclamation should be undertaken soon, in order to fully <br /> <br />~ GEl Consultants, Inc. <br /> <br />97411\REPORTS\TEXT -A.WPD <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.