My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00345
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00345
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:20 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:50:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153330
Contractor Name
Upper Yampa Water Conservancy District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Routt
Bill Number
SB 77-35
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />III <br /> <br />CONSTRUCTION REVIEW <br />A. General <br /> <br />The comments and recommendations in this section are intended to assist <br /> <br />in obtaining good quality construction at minimum cost. It is generally <br /> <br />agreed that bids are most competitive when both the contract requirements and <br /> <br />the site conditions are well defined. With this in mind, every effort should <br /> <br />be made to give bidders all available information. At the same time it is <br /> <br />considered advisable on the part of the owner to share the risk for possible <br /> <br />conditions which cannot be foreseen by either party at the time of contract <br /> <br />award. The provision for such conditions which appears on page 77 (Item 26.3) <br /> <br />affords contractors only partial protection by comparison with most Federal <br /> <br />Government construction contracts with which dam contractors are usually <br /> <br />familiar. It is 'recommended that a standard "Changed Conditions" clause <br /> <br />replace Item 26.3 and that Item 40 (page 44), which does not appear appli- <br /> <br />cable to the Yamco1o damsite, be deleted. The recommended clause is Section 4 <br /> <br />of Standard Form 23-A which is available from the Bureau of Reclamation. <br /> <br />Standardized wording in the changed conditions clause is considered <br /> <br />important for several reasons: <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />l. <br />2. <br /> <br />Bidders are less likely to add a contingency for unknowns. <br /> <br />Some contractors will not bid work such as a dam if the clause <br /> <br />is not provided. <br />Claims and litigation are reduced because the legal meaning of <br /> <br />the clause has been established in Previous cases, <br /> <br />To reduce the possibility for claims and to obtain Inore competitive <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />bids it is recommended that site inspections be as complete as possible. <br /> <br />If final bid documents have not been issued, general layout drawings should <br /> <br />be available at the site. It is helpful to have exploration logs and test <br /> <br />results available and the corresponding holes and pits staked for approxi- <br /> <br />mate location. As many as possible of the test pits should be reopened <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.