My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00345
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00345
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:20 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:50:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153330
Contractor Name
Upper Yampa Water Conservancy District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Routt
Bill Number
SB 77-35
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />Specification <br />Page or Draw- <br />ing No. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />P. 121 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />P. 137 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Pp. 138-142 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />P. 140 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />P. 141 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Clay grout is permitted in drains and sumps. Due to the re1a- <br /> <br />tive1y high gradients in this area after reservoir filling, <br /> <br />cement grout should be required. <br /> <br />No minimum limit is specified for Zone 1 fines content. After <br /> <br />inspecting the proposed source (spillway excavation) this <br /> <br />limit appears unnecessary, provided Zone 1 is consistently <br /> <br />more impervious than Zone 2. This may require selective load- <br /> <br />ing and placing at times during construction. <br /> <br />Specs cai1 for both method and end result on compaction. The <br /> <br />specified limits on moisture content and minimum relative <br /> <br />compaction requirements are considered entirely adequate to <br /> <br />obtain a good end result. The requirement for number of passes <br /> <br />should be eliminated and roller specifications worded to permit <br /> <br />approved substitutes for the tamping roller (See note for <br /> <br />P. 141). These changes will simplify inspection and may reduce <br /> <br />bid prices. <br /> <br />Specs referring to density control are not realistic as they refer <br /> <br />to limits normally applied to moisture. <br /> <br />The requirement for a tamping roller for Zone 1 is controversial. <br /> <br />Materials containing gravel and cobbles sometimes cause inter- <br /> <br />ference with tamping feet, resulting in poor compaction. Main- <br /> <br />tenance problems usually arise with a single tamping roller <br /> <br />as the feet wear down and are no longer effective. It is <br /> <br />recommended that a 50-ton pneumaticmtired roller and 10-inch <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.