My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00335
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00335
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:03:42 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:50:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153512
Contractor Name
Summit County
Water District
64
County
Logan
Bill Number
XB 99-999
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Small Reservoir Feasibility Study <br /> <br />S-9 <br /> <br />Reservoir Levels <br /> <br />Dillon Reservoir levels are unchanged between Scenarios II and III, but are lowered <br />by negligible amounts during runoff months by the increased Peru Creek operations <br />depicted in Scenario IV, <br /> <br />Peru Creek Reservoir remains substantially full in many years (those when few <br />releases are required) and fills in two out of every three years, The maximum annual release <br />over the study period was 2200 AF, indicating that a facility smaller than 4650 AF could be <br />considered, Average annual evaporation is approximately 70 AF for the 4650 AF facility. <br /> <br />Exnort Levels <br /> <br />Levels of transmountain diversion are unchanged in Scenarios III and IV from those of <br />the baseline scenarios, <br /> <br />CONCWSIONSAND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />The following general conclusions can be drawn from the baseline analyses carried <br />out in the basin study: <br /> <br />1. With respect to water supply, most County water users appear <br />to have adequate water rights and augmentation plans to <br />meet their projected ultimate demand levels. Strict <br />interpretation of and adherence to the USBR's Green <br />Mountain minimum storage targets could induce some <br />shortages in augmentation releases from the Sales Pool and a <br />few users show ultimate demands slightly in excess of their <br />decree limits. Although substantial shortages are indicated at <br />the Climax mine, their use of recycled water from tailings <br />ponds was not modeled so shortages there may be <br />overstated, Minor shortages to snowmaking demands on the <br />Snake River and West Tenmile Creek are induced by instream <br />flow requirements, Straight Creek will not be able to provide <br />the entire ultimate water supply demand of Dillon and Dillon <br />Valley. <br /> <br />2, With respect to instream flows, the negotiated agreements <br />generally appear adequate to protect minimum stream <br />conditions without significant impact on other water users, <br />Flows on the Snake River below the North Fork are routinely <br />below the 6 cfs decreed instream flow under ultimate <br />demand conditions, During the fall and winter and flows <br />below Dillon fall below 50 cfs about once every 6 years, <br />Deficiencies below Dillon in the fall and early winter are <br />exacerbated by exchanges for upstream snowmaking use, <br />The use of a monthly time step in the basin model masks <br />instream flow deficiencies of less than a month's duration, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.