<br />the Colorado Department of Natural Resources, Divi-
<br />sion of Water Resources, Office of the State Engineer,
<br />and the Castle Pines Metropolitan District then began a
<br />study to better define the hydrologic characteristics of
<br />the bedrock aquifers in the area. The purpose of this
<br />work was to obtain detailed geologic and hydrologic
<br />data pertaining to the bedrock aquifers and to develop
<br />and evaluate new techniques for estimating aquifer
<br />characteristics by use of core analyses, aquifer testing,
<br />and geophysical logging.
<br />
<br />Purpose and Scope
<br />
<br />This report describes techniques for estimating
<br />the specific yield and specific retention of an aquifer
<br />from grain-size analyses of aquifer samples and from
<br />borehole geophysical logs. The techniques described
<br />are based on empirical correlations between indepen-
<br />dent and dependent variables that are analyzed by
<br />least-squares linear regression. Regression analyses of
<br />specific retention on grain-size characteristics, and
<br />regression of specific yield or specific yield divided by
<br />porosity on geophysical-log response each produced
<br />statistically significant relations. The validity of some
<br />of the techniques is demonstrated, and a specific-yield
<br />log calculated from other geophysical logs is described.
<br />Data used in this report are contained in Robson
<br />and Banta (1993); sample handling and analyses proce-
<br />dures are described in McWhorter and Garcia (1990),
<br />Raforth and Jehn (1990), and Robson and Banta
<br />(1993). A previous report pertaining to this test site
<br />(Robson and Banta, 1990) describes techniques for
<br />estimating aquifer specific storage on the basis of
<br />barometric efficiency, aquifer testing, or aquifer-
<br />compression measurements.
<br />
<br />Background
<br />
<br />Data for work described in this report were
<br />obtained at a test site located about 20 mi south of Den-
<br />ver (fig. I) at an altitude of6,61O ft on the hilly western
<br />margin of the Denver basin. In July 1985, an irrigation
<br />well (well A3) was completed in the Arapahoe aquifer
<br />at a total depth of 2,398 ft. In February 1987, Jehn
<br />Water Consultants undertook drilling of a core hole
<br />(hole CI) at a site 58 ft southeast of well A3 (fig. I).
<br />Core was recovered to a depth of 1,957 ft, at which
<br />point the core barrel was lost, forcing abandonment
<br />of the hole after the upper 1,955 ft of hole was logged
<br />(Raforth and Jehn, 1990). A second core hole
<br />(hole CIA) was drilled to 1,895 ft at a site 68 ft south-
<br />southeast of well A3 (fig. I). Coring continued from
<br />
<br />1,895 to 3,1l0 ft and was followed by geophysical
<br />logging. Both core holes were subsequently filled by
<br />injection of cement grout and abandoned. In October
<br />1987, well USGS was drilled for the U.S. Geological
<br />Survey to a depth of 2,400 ft at a site 50 ft east of
<br />well A3 (fig. 1). After extensive geophysical logging
<br />of well USGS, 2,400 ft of steel casing was grouted into
<br />the hole and gun perforated through the Arapahoe aqui-
<br />fer to form an observation well. Well USGS was
<br />capped at the completion of the study.
<br />The test site is underlain by the four principal
<br />bedrock aquifers of the Denver basin aquifer system
<br />(Robson, 1987). The Dawson aquifer is the shallowest
<br />of these aquifers and is underlain by the Denver aqui-
<br />fer, the Arapahoe aquifer, and the Laramie-Fox Hills
<br />aquifer. The three uppermost aquifers were considered
<br />in this work. The three aquifers consist of poorly to
<br />moderately consolidated, interlayered conglomerate,
<br />sandstone, siltstone, and mudstone. Sandstone is the
<br />most prevalent water-yielding material and ranges
<br />from very fine- to coarse-grained, poorly to well-sorted
<br />arkosic and quartzose sandstone. Mudstone units form
<br />confining layers within and between the principal aqui-
<br />fers. Mudstone generally consists of poorly to moder-
<br />ately sorted, very fine sand, silt, and clay. No carbonate
<br />rocks are present in these Denver basin aquifers.
<br />Specific yield is defined (Lohman and others,
<br />1972) as the ratio of (1) the volume of water that a sat-
<br />urated rock will yield by gravity drainage to (2) the vol.
<br />ume of the rock. This definition implies that gravity
<br />drainage has reached equilibrium. In drainage experi-
<br />ments, equilibrium is difficult to achieve because of the
<br />incomplete drainage of heterogeneous aquifer materi-
<br />als and the slow drainage of the unsaturated zone, par-
<br />ticuary in fine-grained materials. As a result, specific
<br />yield calculated from field-drainage experiments of
<br />limited duration (such as aquifer tests) usually is
<br />smaller than the true specific yield of the aquifer mate-
<br />rial. Specific yields determined through use of centri-
<br />fuge or porous-plate laboratory techniques have been
<br />shown (Neuman, 1987) to be less affected by slow
<br />drainage and, thus, are better indicators of the equilib-
<br />rium specific yield of aquifer materials. Porosity, spe-
<br />cific yield, and specific retention are related and
<br />commonly are expressed in dimensionless units:
<br />
<br />$ = SY + SR,
<br />
<br />(1)
<br />
<br />where
<br />$ = the porosity,
<br />SY = the specific yield, and
<br />SR = the specific retention.
<br />
<br />2 Techniques for Estlmstlng Specific Yield and Specific Retanllon from Graln-S1ze DBla snd Geophysical Logs Irom
<br />Clastic Bedrock Aquifers
<br />
|