Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the Colorado Department of Natural Resources, Divi- <br />sion of Water Resources, Office of the State Engineer, <br />and the Castle Pines Metropolitan District then began a <br />study to better define the hydrologic characteristics of <br />the bedrock aquifers in the area. The purpose of this <br />work was to obtain detailed geologic and hydrologic <br />data pertaining to the bedrock aquifers and to develop <br />and evaluate new techniques for estimating aquifer <br />characteristics by use of core analyses, aquifer testing, <br />and geophysical logging. <br /> <br />Purpose and Scope <br /> <br />This report describes techniques for estimating <br />the specific yield and specific retention of an aquifer <br />from grain-size analyses of aquifer samples and from <br />borehole geophysical logs. The techniques described <br />are based on empirical correlations between indepen- <br />dent and dependent variables that are analyzed by <br />least-squares linear regression. Regression analyses of <br />specific retention on grain-size characteristics, and <br />regression of specific yield or specific yield divided by <br />porosity on geophysical-log response each produced <br />statistically significant relations. The validity of some <br />of the techniques is demonstrated, and a specific-yield <br />log calculated from other geophysical logs is described. <br />Data used in this report are contained in Robson <br />and Banta (1993); sample handling and analyses proce- <br />dures are described in McWhorter and Garcia (1990), <br />Raforth and Jehn (1990), and Robson and Banta <br />(1993). A previous report pertaining to this test site <br />(Robson and Banta, 1990) describes techniques for <br />estimating aquifer specific storage on the basis of <br />barometric efficiency, aquifer testing, or aquifer- <br />compression measurements. <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />Data for work described in this report were <br />obtained at a test site located about 20 mi south of Den- <br />ver (fig. I) at an altitude of6,61O ft on the hilly western <br />margin of the Denver basin. In July 1985, an irrigation <br />well (well A3) was completed in the Arapahoe aquifer <br />at a total depth of 2,398 ft. In February 1987, Jehn <br />Water Consultants undertook drilling of a core hole <br />(hole CI) at a site 58 ft southeast of well A3 (fig. I). <br />Core was recovered to a depth of 1,957 ft, at which <br />point the core barrel was lost, forcing abandonment <br />of the hole after the upper 1,955 ft of hole was logged <br />(Raforth and Jehn, 1990). A second core hole <br />(hole CIA) was drilled to 1,895 ft at a site 68 ft south- <br />southeast of well A3 (fig. I). Coring continued from <br /> <br />1,895 to 3,1l0 ft and was followed by geophysical <br />logging. Both core holes were subsequently filled by <br />injection of cement grout and abandoned. In October <br />1987, well USGS was drilled for the U.S. Geological <br />Survey to a depth of 2,400 ft at a site 50 ft east of <br />well A3 (fig. 1). After extensive geophysical logging <br />of well USGS, 2,400 ft of steel casing was grouted into <br />the hole and gun perforated through the Arapahoe aqui- <br />fer to form an observation well. Well USGS was <br />capped at the completion of the study. <br />The test site is underlain by the four principal <br />bedrock aquifers of the Denver basin aquifer system <br />(Robson, 1987). The Dawson aquifer is the shallowest <br />of these aquifers and is underlain by the Denver aqui- <br />fer, the Arapahoe aquifer, and the Laramie-Fox Hills <br />aquifer. The three uppermost aquifers were considered <br />in this work. The three aquifers consist of poorly to <br />moderately consolidated, interlayered conglomerate, <br />sandstone, siltstone, and mudstone. Sandstone is the <br />most prevalent water-yielding material and ranges <br />from very fine- to coarse-grained, poorly to well-sorted <br />arkosic and quartzose sandstone. Mudstone units form <br />confining layers within and between the principal aqui- <br />fers. Mudstone generally consists of poorly to moder- <br />ately sorted, very fine sand, silt, and clay. No carbonate <br />rocks are present in these Denver basin aquifers. <br />Specific yield is defined (Lohman and others, <br />1972) as the ratio of (1) the volume of water that a sat- <br />urated rock will yield by gravity drainage to (2) the vol. <br />ume of the rock. This definition implies that gravity <br />drainage has reached equilibrium. In drainage experi- <br />ments, equilibrium is difficult to achieve because of the <br />incomplete drainage of heterogeneous aquifer materi- <br />als and the slow drainage of the unsaturated zone, par- <br />ticuary in fine-grained materials. As a result, specific <br />yield calculated from field-drainage experiments of <br />limited duration (such as aquifer tests) usually is <br />smaller than the true specific yield of the aquifer mate- <br />rial. Specific yields determined through use of centri- <br />fuge or porous-plate laboratory techniques have been <br />shown (Neuman, 1987) to be less affected by slow <br />drainage and, thus, are better indicators of the equilib- <br />rium specific yield of aquifer materials. Porosity, spe- <br />cific yield, and specific retention are related and <br />commonly are expressed in dimensionless units: <br /> <br />$ = SY + SR, <br /> <br />(1) <br /> <br />where <br />$ = the porosity, <br />SY = the specific yield, and <br />SR = the specific retention. <br /> <br />2 Techniques for Estlmstlng Specific Yield and Specific Retanllon from Graln-S1ze DBla snd Geophysical Logs Irom <br />Clastic Bedrock Aquifers <br />