Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Exhibit I - Scope of Services <br />Metropolitan Water Supply Investigation <br /> <br />November 17, 1993 <br />Page 14 <br /> <br />goals could buy more time for Metro with respect to making the best decision regarding South <br />Platte water quality issues. This is especially relevant given that EPA has committed itself to <br />assisting the region in exploring water supply alternatives to Two Forks. <br /> <br />Southern Water Suoolv Proiect - The Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District <br />(the District) is in the advanced planning stages for its Southern Water Supply Project (SWSP), <br />consisting of a gravity pipeline from Carter Lake which will deliver water to participating <br />municipal water users in Boulder and Weld County, This project grew out of an assessment of <br />municipal and industrial water supply needs within the existing District and its currently <br />contemplated service area only. As a part of this effort the District has developed a great deal <br />of information on existing municipal water supplies and future needs, alternative pipeline <br />routes, sizes, costs and environmental impacts. Design of the SWSP is expected to be <br />completed in the summer of 1993 and construction is expected to begin in 1994, <br /> <br />While the sizing and alignment of the proposed pipeline is based on the needs and <br />financial capabilities of current project participants only, the easements associated with the <br />proposed pipeline have been sized by the District in anticipation of an additional pipeline at <br />some future time. In doing so the District has recognized the possibility that more <br />comprehensive front range water management needs could be served in the future by additional <br />conveyance capacity from Northern Colorado to the metro Denver area, However, the District <br />has not studied such future potential, and its current policies do not contemplate the use of <br />water from CBT, Windy Gap or Northern "base supply" south of Boulder and Weld Counties. <br /> <br />The MWSI Project should consider a wide range of options which may involve the use <br />of Northern Colorado water supplies and project facilities in meeting Front Range water <br />management issues while keeping in mind the legitimate interests of Northern Colorado, In <br />doing so, the MWSI Project should solicit the active involvement of Northern Colofado <br />representatives, <br /> <br />Araoahoe Countv Utility Advisory Board Studies - Watef Providers in Arapahoe County <br />have organized through a County-formed Utility Advisory Board since early 1990, This <br />Utility Advisory Board was charged with investigating new plans of water supply development <br />in view of the failure of Two Forks, Water providers in Arapahoe County participated in <br />approximately 18.5% of the Two Forks project and the economic development that has begun <br />to occur over the last 18 months highlights the need to find new supplies to replace the Two <br />Forks supplies that would have been delivered to the County. <br /> <br />The Utility Advisory Board focused in on the County's very significant groundwater <br />supply as a source of meeting those demands. Currently some 32 million acre-feet of <br />groundwater exists under Arapahoe County in the non-tributafY aquifefs of the Denver Basin. <br />Under Senate Bill 5 the providers in the County could potentially withdraw some 320,000 <br />acre-feet of groundwater a year. Studies of the groundwater by the Utility Advisory Board <br />have recommended that consideration be given to producing 30,000 acre-feet of groundwater <br />annually to meet projected demands for approximately a 50 year period, <br /> <br />Rather than depletion of the groundwater resource over time, the Utility Advisory Board <br />has considered the potential "conjunctive use" of these groundwatef supplies with surface water <br />supplies derived from the mountains. The conjunctive use sch<,r.' that was developed would <br />utilize the groundwater supplies only in periods of drought. The groundwater system that is <br />developed would then serve as a stand alone system component that could deliver 30,000 acre- <br />feet of water supply to Arapahoe County in any year as required by drought, <br />