Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />- <br />I <br />I <br />- <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />embankment materi a1 s were poorly compacted. Thi s loose state was model ed in <br />the stabil i ty analysi s by usi ng soll densi ti es whi ch are approximately 90 <br />percent of standard Proctor maximum d~nsity for the embankment material. <br /> <br />Determination of the shear strength parameters is the most important phase of <br />a stabil ity ana1ysi s. It is di ffi cu1 t, however, to obtai n representati ve <br />samples, avoid sample disturbance, simulate external loading and internal pore <br />pressure conditions, and avoid inherent test error in the testing methods: It <br />is typically impossible to obtain s~mples that truly represent the range of <br />materials existing in the field. For these reasons, shear strength parameters <br />are generally determined from sampll!s representing extremes, and parameters <br />are selected within the range. Hence, a significant amount of judgment and <br />experience plays an extremely important role in the evaluation of laboratory <br />test resul ts to ensure that the parameters chosen are representati ve of the <br />materials in place. <br /> <br />Exploratory bori ngs in Peterson lake Dam reveal ed a homogeneous sil ty sand in <br />the upper 10 to 12 feet, and then alternating 3-to 6-inch lenses of silty sand <br />with gravel, clean gravelly sand, Clayey sand, sandy clay, and low density <br />peat down to the bedrock foundation. Typical shear strengths of all the <br />layers containing predominantly sand and/or gravel fall within a relatively <br />narrow range. From a stability standpoint, these layers can be modeled using <br />a single shear strength. The OCCasional lenses of sandy clay and peat <br />represent potential weak seams within the embankment. <br /> <br />Cansol i dated-undra i ned tri axi a1 shear tests were performed on samp1 es from <br />Peterson Dam containing predominantly sand and gravel. The effective angle of <br />internal friction (~I) for these samples ranged from 39 to 44 degrees with 0 <br />to 2 psi effective cohesion (c'). These values are at the upper bound of the <br />typical range of shear strength for thi s type of materi a1. It is al so <br />alarming that these high friction angles were obtained for such poorly <br />compacted soils. <br /> <br />Because of the granular nature of the primary materials comprlslng the <br />embankment, soil cohesion should not be depended on for shearing resistance; <br /> <br />-53- <br />