Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />repaired several times in the past by patching existing defects. Most of the <br />repair work has been done to the inlet drop structure. The latest repair in <br />1982 embedded an l8-inch diameter PVC pipe and elbow in concrete within the <br />lower porti on of the 36-i nch diameter CMP condui t, and through the <br />intersection of the drop section and the upstream end of the original arch <br />out1 et condui t. Fi gure V. 1 is a sketch of that modi fi cati on; Thi s <br />modification greatly reduced the discharge capacity of the outlet works. <br />Flows through the conduit are controlled from the crest by a manually operated <br />sl i de gate located at the downstream si de of the wet well. Hi gh flows are <br />controlled by the 18-inch diameter conduit section. <br /> <br />Inspection of the outlet conduit and wet well showed them to be in fair <br />condi ti on. A log of the i nspecti on is i ncl uded in Appendi x A. A few inches <br />of sand and gravel covered the conduit invert downstream of the slide gate. <br />Some erosion of the invert concrete could be detected upstream of the wet well <br />but is not serious. Waste mortar from the various patching efforts is evident <br />in several locations at the base of the side walls. Several minor cracks and <br />pin-hole seeps were noted in the c.onduit. Minor erosion has occurred at <br />several horizontal construction joints associated with the method in which the <br />condui twas ori gi nally constructed, whi ch produced feather edges of concrete <br />separated by tar paper. Patchi ng of defects over the years wi th mortar and <br />epoxy seems to be performi ng we 11 with no evi dence of spall i ng or <br />deterioration. The wet well was in good shape with the exception of a cold <br />joint about 15 feet above the bottom of the well. Seepage was evident through <br />the segregated, unconsolidated aggregate at the joint around the perimeter of <br />the wet well. There is also evidence that some differential movement may have <br />occurred. Sand and gravel have been collecting at the bottom of the wet well <br />with several cobbles, about four inches in diameter, have been deposited in <br />the recess formed by the steel gui des of the sl I de gate. Un1 ess increased <br />flow velocity, that would occur when the gate is closed, washed these cobbles <br />away, it would be impossible to close the gate. The gate and operating stem, <br />although rusty, appeared to be in satisfactory operating condition. <br /> <br />-39- <br />