Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />extended 51 feet upstream wi th 36-i nch di ameter rei nforced concrete pipe in <br />1966. In 1985 the old conduit upstream of the wet well was repaired by <br />grouting in place a 32-inch diameter steel liner. The original concrete <br />horseshoe section downstream of the wet well has been patched several ti~es <br />over the years with mortar and epoxy. The intake to the outlet conduit is <br />fl ush wi th the stream bottom and the openi ng is protected by a steel trash <br />rack. Di scharge at the downstream end of the condui tis controll ed by a <br />flared concrete energy dissipator. Flow through the conduit is controlled <br />from the crest by a manually operated sl ide gate located at the downstream <br />side of the wet well. <br /> <br />Inspection of the inlet, wet well, and conduit showed them to be in fair to <br />good condi ti on. A log of the i nspecti on is i ncl uded in Appendi x A. The <br />concrete pipe and steel section upstream of the wet well were in good <br />condi ti on. Driftwood debri s was present in the i nl et chamber, and sand and <br />gravel debri s had accumulated for a di stance of approximately ten feet into <br />the conduit. Downstream of the wet well the conduit was clear. The wet well <br />was also in good shape with only a few ~inor cracks. Some sand and gravel had <br />accumul ated at the sunken floor of the wet well and erosi on was observed <br />underneath the gate sill plate, although it had not undermined it co~pletely. <br />The gate and operati ng stem were rusty but appeared to be in sati sfactory <br />operating condition. The conduit downstream of the wet \'/ell, through the <br />original concrete arch, was judged to be in good condition. Minor erosion has <br />occurred at several horizontal construction joints, associated with the method <br />in which the conduit was originally constructed which produced feathered edges <br />of concrete separated by tar paper. A few minor cracks were observed with <br />evidence of some seepage infiltration. Patching of defects carried out <br />previously appeared to be of good quality. Very little erosion of the invert <br />concrete was observed. <br /> <br />The energy di ssipator at the condui t outl et is severely deteri orated and in <br />poor condition. The wall s are cracked and the floor sl ab has been eroded so <br />that in several places reinforcing steel is exposed. The downstream end of <br />the structure has been undermi ned and 1 arge porti ons of concrete floor sl ab <br /> <br />2084H <br /> <br />-6- <br />