Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I. <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br /> <br />RF 406* <br />97l5-F <br /> <br />Adjudication Amount of <br />Case Priori ty Water <br />No. Date Adjudicated Depth <br />W-2595 2/6/1909 65 gpm 768' <br />W-2595 8/31/1921 25 gpm 562' <br />W-2594 11/25/1965 475 gpm 50' <br />W-2594 1/1/1937 175 gpm 52' <br />W-2594 7/1/1946 125 gpm 33' <br /> <br />Well <br />No. <br /> <br />. State <br />Engineer's <br />Reg. No. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~Replacement Well <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />All five of the wells were adjudicated in October, 1973 and the Town was <br />awarded "certain absolute underground water rights." The water supply to the <br />wells drilled into the alluvial acquifer comes entirely from the river supply. <br />The wells are supplied either directly from the river or by intercepting the <br />groundwater flow before it reaches the river. Therefore, the underground <br />water rights may be considered as equivalent to surface water rights of equal <br />priority date with an alternate means of diversion. All three of the alluvial <br />wells have relatively recent priority dates, the earliest being 1937. Strict <br />administration of the river by the State Engineer is currently being processed <br />by the Courts. Dependent on the determination by the courts, the three alluvial <br />wells may be limited to pumping only three or four days per week. This is <br />not expected to cause a significant water shortage to the Town of Swink until <br />late in the design period. It may require construction of additional storage <br />facilities earlier in the design period in order to meet maximum'month, maximum <br />week, maximum day, and peak hour demands. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The water rights established on the deep wells are relatively secure. Re- <br />placement wells into these acquifers can be obtained without undue legal <br />problems. However, additional water rights from the deep acquifers represents <br />quite a different problem. All well permits, appropriations and water are <br />controlled in accordance with State Law SB-2l3 and policy guidelines of the <br />Colorado Groundwater Commission. Annual appropriations and well permits are <br />issued based on 1/100 of the estimated life of the acquiferunderlying the ; <br />area of use. All prior use and appropriations would be deducted from the <br />estimated 1/100 acquifer life figure and the balance ~ould be appropriated <br />to the applicant. This process is further complicated by a recent court <br />ruling that the water rights on non-tributary acquifers belongs to the land <br />owner. What this is currently being interpreted to mean is that in order for <br />the Town to drill additional wells into these acquifers and use this water, <br />they must obtain consent from all land owners within the affected area. In <br />the case of a town it is nearly impossible to obtain consent from all land owners <br />within the town limits. For the town to obtain additional water supplies from <br />these acquifers does not, at the present time, seem to be a feasible alternative. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />2.4 STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS <br /> <br />The town operates on a dual system. "Soft" (potable) water is supplied by <br />the two deep wells, provided limited treatment and then pumped to the "soft" <br />water storage and distribution systems. All dwelling units and commercial <br />establishments are connected to the "soft" water distribution system. "Hard" <br /> <br />-13- <br />