My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00273
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00273
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:15 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:47:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153368
Contractor Name
Cache LaPoudre Water Development Study
Water District
0
County
Larimer
Bill Number
SB 81-439
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
241
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The financial evaluations are summarized on the following table. Th.e base <br />data section of the table displays the total capital costs and the annual <br />operation, maintenance and replacement costs (in 1982 dollars) fOI: each <br />alternative along with the projected on-line date of the alternative assuming <br />that planning activities begin in mid-1983 and are followed by desi'~n and <br />construction. <br /> <br />The total capital costs were escalated for inflation throughout the <br />assumed planning, design and construction period. 1he escalated costs were <br />then used to estimate total investment costs and the annual cost of assumed <br />debt retirement. <br /> <br />The table illustrates the total investment cost (capital costs escalated <br />for inflation) and the annual costs (the annual amortization requirement plus <br />operation, maintenance and replacement) under the two funding approaches. The <br />table also provides the estimated cost burden on peaking power (in 1982 <br />dollars) . The cost burden is expressed as a composite value of the peaking <br />power output including both a capacity and energy component. It is expressed <br />both as a cost per kilowatt-hour of energy production and as a cost per <br />kilowatt~year based on installed capacity. <br /> <br />The numbers displayed on the table clearly demonstrate the impact of <br />inflation and the difference in costs under the two financing approaches. 1he <br />two financing approaches were selected to illustrate two extremes of a broad <br />range of potential financial arrangements which would have to be investigated <br />further in more detailed feasibility studies. <br /> <br />F. COIICLUSIORS AND RBCXWIDIDATIOIIS <br /> <br />The present study has developed useful information about large storage <br />reservoirs in the upper Cache la Poudre Basin. Although the uncertainties <br />associated with both the future demand for peaking power and the need for new <br />reservoirs prevent one from arriving at firm conclusions as to what would or <br />would not be feasible 10-15 years from now, the projects examined in this <br />study appear to have been sufficiently analyzed for the present. <br /> <br />On the other hand, given the limitations placed upon the geographical <br />scope of this study, many questions remain unanswered concerning the future <br />water resources needs of the Cache la poudre Basin and the alternative means <br />available to meet var ious water resource developnent and management <br />objectives. Questions regarding future water and power demands, the future of <br />irrigated lands, the condition of the existing plains reservoirs and <br />alternatives to large new storage projects in the canyon (which alternatives <br />may include smaller capacity reservoir project(s) in the upper basin) all need <br />to be addressed before decisions can be reached on what future projects and <br />management actions might be feasible and desirable. <br /> <br />The best means of addressing these questions would be a carefully designed <br />study of basin-wide scope (upper and lower basin) formulated with the <br />participation of all interested parties in the basin. In March 1983, the <br />Board recommended that the General Assembly authorize the expenditure of not <br /> <br />S-6 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />----.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.