Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />.-. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Potential projects could include storage reservoirs in <br />portion of the basin for the purpose of regulating <br />hydroelectric peaking power production as well as for <br />conservation storage. <br /> <br />the upper <br />flows for <br />additional <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />A numuer of potential reservoir sites would be considered indi- <br />vidually and in various combinations as alternative projects which <br />would exhibit a wide range of possible development. <br /> <br />Potential reservoir sites were identified from previous planning studies, <br />by analysis of topographic maps and by site visits. Seven major reservoir <br />sites appeared to be the most promising locations for storage in the upper <br />basin, they are: <br /> <br />Grey Mountain Reservoir on the mainstem (conservation storage). <br /> <br />New Seaman Reservoir on the North Fork (conservation storage) . <br /> <br />Elkhorn Reservoir on the mainstem (conservation storage or peaking power <br />production). <br /> <br />Indian Meadows Reservoir on the mainstem (peaking power production). <br /> <br />Idylwilde Reservoir on the mainstem (peaking power production) . <br /> <br />Rockwell Reservoir on the South Fork (peaking power production). <br /> <br />Upper Poudre Reservoir on the mainstem (peaking power production). <br /> <br />The seven potential reservoir sites represent possible storage locations <br />that could be linked together to form potential projects to serve the <br />functions of conservation storage and hydroelectr ic power generation. The <br />developrnent concepts listed above were applied to the potential reservoi r <br />sites to formulate a broad range of alternatives. <br /> <br />The formulation process was initiated with the development of a "universe" <br />of conceptual projects ranging from a single reservoir for conservation <br />storage purposes to large, multiple reservoir systems with connecting tunnels, <br />conduits, diversion darns and power plants to produce peaking hydropower as <br />well as provide conservation storage. <br /> <br />Very preliminary analyses indicated that the entire "universe" of con- <br />ceptual projects could be represented by six basic configurations which would <br />illustrate the full range of possibilities for the development of the power <br />potential in the upper basin as well as a spectrum of change in the present <br />use of the streams in the upper basin. The six basic configurations initially <br />selected for evaluation as preliminary alternatives in Phase I of the study <br />were: <br /> <br />S-3 <br />