Laserfiche WebLink
<br />some 1,050 square miles in area, is primarily the water yielding area; while <br />the lower basin, some 800 square miles in area, is the area of water use. <br />Figure 1-1 is a map of the basin showing the upper and lower basins separated <br />by a dotted line which intersects the River at the mouth of the canyon. <br /> <br />The study examined such projects as would be located on the mainst.em of <br />the Cache la Poudre River or its tributaries (i.e., the North or South FOrks) <br />upstream from Fort Collins. Although segments of the mainstem and South Fork <br />are under study for possible inclusion in the national wild and scenic rivers <br />system, those segments were not excluded from consideration for reservoir <br />sites in this study. Likewise, the existence of designated wilderness areas <br />was not taken as a constraint on the siting of potential reservoirs or any <br />other potential project features. <br /> <br />D. S!'ODY MNllGJlIIBN'l' <br /> <br />Pursuant to the proper statutory procedures, the Colorado Water Conser- <br />vation Board selected Tudor Engineering Company to perform the study. Under <br />the general guidance of the Colorado Water Conservation Board's staff, Tudor <br />was responsible for carrying out all aspects of the study and for the <br />preparation of all necessary study documentation and reports. Final decisions <br />concerning the scope and conduct of the study, the evaluation criteria <br />employed at each stage of the study and the recommendations made at the <br />conclusion of the study were the responsibility of the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board. <br /> <br />B. CXlRIlIla' OF DB S!'ODY <br /> <br />The study was conducted in two phases. In Phase I of the study, it was <br />originally intended that four to six preliminary alternative projects would be <br />selected for evaluation. Fourteen potential alternative projects were <br />identified, evaluated and then screened down to six preliminary alternative <br />projects. As a result of discussion with the Advisory Committee and input <br />received during public meetings, two additional preliminary alternative <br />projects were added for preliminary evaluation. These eight preliminary <br />alternative projects were analyzed and evaluated during Phase I of the <br />study. The results of Phase I were presented in the "Interim Report on the <br />Cache la Poudre Project Study" and an addendum to that report in July 1982. <br /> <br />In the original scope of work, it was intended that one or two alternative <br />projects would be selected for evaluation at reconnaissance level in Phase II <br />of the study. Following completion of Phase I, the decision of the Colorado <br />Water Conservation Board was to investigate four alternative projects during <br />Phase II of the study. The four selected alternative projects were analyzed <br />and evaluated during Phase II of the study. The results of both Phase I and <br />Phase II of the study are presented in this report. <br /> <br />The decision to investigate eight preliminary alternative projects instead <br />of four to six during Phase I and four alternative projects instead of one or <br />two during Phase II necessitated changes in the scope of work for the study. <br />The additional effort resulting from investigation of a greater number of <br /> <br />1-2 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />