Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Manufacturi ng <br /> <br />Wholesale and retail trade generally reflect the rise and fall of local con- <br />sumer expenditures and, with the exception of the influx of tourist dollars, <br />represent existing money circulating throughout community as a result of con- <br />sumer purchases. "New" money to the community comes from such sources as tour- <br />ism and locally manufactured goods which are sold outside of the immediate <br />trade area. Many smaller communities such as Canon City are actively trying <br />to develop a base of industrial and manufacturing activity. A more diversified <br />economy, especially one with regional or national trade areas, tends to be <br />less dependent on the cycle of local business activity, thereby providing <br />the promise of stability during periods of economic decline. Thus because it <br />represents a source of "new" money and a broader based economy, manufacturi ng <br />has been traditionally viewed as an asset to a community. <br /> <br />Tables 25 and 26 present data on manufacturing in Fremont County. It can be <br />assumed that most of the manufacturing firms listed for the County are located <br />in the Canon City planning area. Employment trends within the manufacturing <br />sector have been discussed earlier and show the development of manufacturing <br />as a major employer and major source of personal income. Table 25 pOints to <br />the significance of the manufacturing sector. The increases recorded in pay- <br />roll, value of shipments and capital expenditures are indicative of growth in <br />the manufacturing group and directly, and indirectly, contributed to the over- <br />all growth of the Canon City economy in the ?eriod 1957-1972. <br /> <br />TABLE 25 <br />MANUFACTURING TRENDS - FREMONT COUNTY <br /> <br />1967 <br /> <br />1972 <br /> <br />28 <br /> <br />8 <br />700 <br />$5.3 Million <br />18.2 Million <br />8. 1 Mill ion <br />25.9 Mill ion <br />3.2 Million <br /> <br />All establishments <br />Establishments with 20 or <br />more employees <br />All employees <br />Payroll <br />Value added by manufacture <br />Cost of materials <br />Value of Shipments <br />Capital expenditures <br /> <br />26 <br /> <br />6 <br />500 <br />$2.6 Million <br />9. 3 Mi 11 ion <br />4.2 Million <br />13.4 Million <br />.4 Million <br /> <br />Source: State of Colorado, U. S. Bureau of the Census, Census of <br />Manufactures, 1967 and 1972. <br /> <br />As can be seen in Table 26 on the following page the number of manufacturing <br />firms increased from 26 to 28 during the period 1967-1972, with the two new <br />firms falling into the employment size c3tegory of 20 to 99 employees. The <br />industrial sector to experience the most growth, increasing from 8 to 12 firms <br />over the period, was the machinery group with losses recorded in the lumber <br />and wood products group. <br /> <br />68 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />