Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PREF^CE <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Kruback Engineering <br /> <br />Associates, <br /> <br />Inc. <br /> <br />submits the <br /> <br />~ollowing proposal ~or the "Feasibility Study" ~or the <br />renovation of the dam impounding Clark Lake. This study <br /> <br />will ~ollow <br /> <br />the "Guidelines" <br /> <br />o~ the <br /> <br />Colorado Water <br /> <br />Conservation Board <br /> <br />(CWCB) to determine the ~eaaibility of <br /> <br />the proJect <br />Justi~ication. <br /> <br />with regard <br /> <br />to economic and engineering <br /> <br />Our work plan will be directed to ~ollow the <br /> <br />outline o~ the CWCB: <br /> <br />so as to provide a ~inal report <br /> <br />providing the required in~ormation ~or each o~ the eight (8) <br />chapters liated in the "Guideline". Our work plan will. in <br /> <br />general, be geared to enaUre that: <br /> <br />(1) the proJect is responsive: <br />(2) the proJect as planned will adequately service the <br /> <br />intended purposed; <br /> <br />(3) the servicea proposed to be performed throughout <br /> <br />the proJect and the benefits it will produce will <br />Justi~y the cost: <br />(4) the proJect is consistent with the local, county, <br /> <br />and state code requirements: <br /> <br />(5) and the proJect is <br />constructed with the ~uture <br /> <br />planned, <br /> <br />designed, <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />needs o~ the North Poudre <br /> <br />Irrigation Company well in mind: so as to provide a <br /> <br />facility that ia not aoon outdated or not needed in the <br />near future. <br />