Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />CHAPTER II <br /> <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLAN <br /> <br />All the joint costs for construction, interest during construction, <br />and operation, maintenance, and replacement that are allocated to recrea- <br />tion and fish and wildlife would be nonreimbursable. In this report all <br />of the specific costs of recreation also have been assumed to be nonreim- <br />bursable. Some of these costs, however, may be paid by non-Federal public <br />bOdies who, under the terms of agreements with the Secretary of the Inter- <br />ior, may avail themselves of the opportunity to manage and develop recrea- <br />tional facilities and assume the costs of operation and maintenance. <br /> <br />Irrigation Repayment <br /> <br />The project irrigators would pay toward project costs to the full <br />extent of their ability as previously discussed. Of their total annual <br />payments of $658,000. approximately $287,000 would be required for irriga- <br />tion operation, maintenance, and replacement costs and the remaining $371,000 <br />would be available for payment of irrigation construction costs. Thus over <br />a 50-year period the irrigators could pay $18,550,000 or 17 percent of the <br />construction costs allocated to irrigation. The revenueS would be collected <br />by conservancy district organizations which would be formed to act as the <br />project contracting and operating organizations. It has been assumed that <br />two districts would be formed (one in Colorado and one in Utah) and that <br />they would operate all the project facilities except the Juniper powerplant <br />which would be operated by the Bureau of Reclamation as part of the Colo- <br />rado River Storage project power system. <br /> <br />Payments toward project construction costs allocated to irrigation <br />would be made from ad valorem tax revenues collected by the conservancy dis- <br />tricts. The tax revenues probably would be obtained from an estimated I-mill <br />levy on the assessed values of all property in the districts' boundaries. <br />Since the districts have not been formed, no estimate has been made of the <br />amount of the probable tax revenues. The amount, however, is expected to <br />be relatively small in comparison to the irrigation allocation. <br /> <br />The construction costs allocated to irrigation and not paid by the <br />irrigators or from ad valorem tax revenues would be paid from power reve- <br />nues apportioned to Colorado and Utah from the Upper Colorado River Basin <br />Fund. Disregarding the small amount which would be received from the ad <br />valorem tax levies, approximately $101,292,000 would be required from the <br />fund. Of this amount, $32,413,000 would be required from Colorado's appor- <br />tionment of funds and the balance of $68,879,000 from Utah's apportionment. <br />The requirements of funds for each State are based on the proportion of the <br />project acreage in each State. <br /> <br />Studies indicate that apportioned revenues from the Upper Colorado <br />River Basin Fund to complete repayment of the Juniper project irrigation <br />costs would be available to Colorado no sooner than about year 2023 and to <br />Utah no sooner than about year 2043. These dates are based on the assump- <br />tion that the Juniper project would be given pri~rity in each State over <br /> <br />54 <br /> <br />