Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Resources described earlier show that the Dawson Arkose may be a good source <br /> <br />of water and that a well yield of 50 gpm could be expected without difficulty. <br /> <br /> <br />The surface area required to be set aside (i.e. no more wells completed <br /> <br /> <br />in the Dawson Arkose) would amount to about 200 acres according to Mr. John <br /> <br />Romero of the Water Resources Division. It appears feasible that the American <br /> <br />Federation of Human Rights could agree to refrain from drilling Dawson Arkose <br /> <br />wells in the SEt of Section JJ and the NEt of the NEt of Section 4 as shown <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />on Map 1 at the rear of this report. If the Federation could agree to that <br /> <br />restriction, a deep well could be located approximately as shown on Map 1. <br /> <br />The area appears to be a gocd geographic location for a well, since it lies <br /> <br />at the confluence of three creek channels and a number of other wells com- <br /> <br />pleted in the general area are all good prcducers. The proposed well site <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />was reviewed with Dr. Morton Bittinger of Earth Resources Inc, a company <br /> <br />specializing in groundwater development. He agreed that the site appears <br /> <br />favorable. <br /> <br />The advantages of a well in the Dawson Arkose are the opposite of the <br /> <br />disadvantages of a shallow well on Plum Creek: <br /> <br />1. Fairly reliable aC'l.uifer, not subject to fluctuations of water <br />level with climate changes. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />2. Apparently no problem with iron in siillilar nearby wells. <br /> <br />The estimated cost to drill and complete one 50 gpm well with a maximum <br /> <br />depth of 500 feet in the location shown is approximately $65,400 - including <br /> <br />the well, pump, well house, and cost multiplier for contingency, inflation, <br /> <br />and professional services. <br /> <br />Annual operation and maintenance costs are estL~ated at $1,500 for <br /> <br />17 <br />