My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C153835A Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
C153835A Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:02:53 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:44:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153835A
Contractor Name
Greeley and Loveland Irrigation Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
3
County
Weld
Bill Number
HB 98-1189
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
280
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Chapter IV - Formulation of Alternatives <br /> <br />The alternatives are classified in two categories: 1) structural rehabilitation; and 2) non- <br />structural. The non-structural alternative is essentially a "do nothing" alternative leaving the existing <br />structure in place with no rehabilitation. Each alternative for the projects are described in detail in <br />the following sections. <br /> <br />There are three main structural components of this study: 1) canals; 2) dams and their <br />appurtenant structures; and 3) canal structures. Each component has different project focus and <br />goals. The existing canal system has been in operation since the turn of the century and is in need of <br />repair. Big Barnes Ditch and Greeley and Loveland Canal flow capacities have been limited over time <br />due to failing of the natural and concrete linings, urban encroachments, and canal crossings. The <br />canal alternatives include three considerations: 1) Protect the existing canal from failure at the present <br />flow capacity; 2) Restore the flow capacity of the existing canal by rehabilitating the system with <br />structural lining; and 3) Restore the canal system to its decreed water right by a combination of <br />structural lining, flow area enlargements and bridge transitions. <br /> <br />The SEO has notified the Company that several of their dams (Le. Horseshoe Dam, Boyd <br />Lake Dam, Equalizer Dam, Upper and Lower Hoffinan Dam and Westerdoll Dam) do not meet the <br />State's safety standards with respect to spillway capacity. Three approaches were studied for each <br />dam which include: 1) the use of an incremental damage analysis to minimize structural requirements <br />for enlarging the spillways; 2) increasing existing spillway capacity using fuseplug spillways, Labyrinth <br />weirs, or adding flood storage reservoir volume; and 3) dam overtopping protection using RCC, or <br />articulated mats. <br /> <br />There are three canal structures which have been in operation since the early 1900's. These <br /> <br />structures include the Lake Loveland North Outlet, Hubbs Check, and Oklahoma Check. These <br /> <br /> <br />structures have functioned well with the exception of the Lake Loveland North Outlet. The present <br /> <br /> <br />North Outlet structure restricts the flow due to inadequate gate capacity which should be replaced <br /> <br />E:\G&LREPORWPD <br /> <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.