My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C153354 Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
C153354 Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2011 10:12:01 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:44:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153354
Contractor Name
Paradox Valley Canal and Reservoir Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
61
County
Montrose
Bill Number
SB 81-439
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CHAPTEE VI <br /> <br />ESTIMATEP COSTS <br /> <br />General <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />One of the prime requisites of a report of this type is the presentation of <br />accurate cost estimates. In order to arrive at cost estimates that will com- <br />ply with this criteria, it is essenti~l that all quantities be carefully com- <br />puted and that every effort be made to assertain unit prices that will be <br />applicable to this individual project. Many factors affect the bid prices that <br />will be received from potential bidders. These prices may vary depending upon <br />the magnitude of the project, the date of the bid opening, availability of <br />materials, or the amount of work of similiar nature under construction in the <br />general vicinity of the project and the various locations throughout the State. <br /> <br />The unit prices used in this report are based upon the most recent construction <br />bids available with allowances having been made for local conditions that may <br />influence the cost of work. The basic. cost estimates were developed using 1981 <br />prices which have been determined from experience which has been developed over <br />many years in preparing estimated construction costs. A contingency factor, <br />based on the unknowns involved, in the amount of 20% has been used. <br /> <br />It must be realized that cost estimates can only be reflected over a compara- <br />tively short time, due to the unstable. condition of labor and material costs. <br />Accordingly, cost estimates shown herein should be considered valid for the <br />near future only. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Time is a very important consideration if the estimates of project costs in <br />this report are considered accurate. Time will be consumed by the following: <br />review and approval of the Feasibility Study; time required to prepare and <br />review and approve the Flood Study; time required to prepare and review and <br />approve the design Plans and Specifications for construction. Three agencies <br />will review in detail the Flood Study and the design Plans and Specifications, <br />these agencies are: the Colorado Water Conservation Board; State Engineer's <br />Office; and the Forest Service. From experience we realize that the "shelf life" <br />and actual review time for the review and approval of the Flood Study and the de- <br />sign Plans and Specifications takes at least four weeks each. With the anti- <br />cipated winter weather conditions that could occur at an elevation of approxi- <br />mately 76,000 foot elevation it's possible the project may not be constructed un- <br />til 1982. Due to the potential delay an allowance for future cost escalations <br />have been placed in the total estimated project costs. <br /> <br />VI-I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.