PROJ00213 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . 27, included that: The express considerations for such conveyance by Plaintiffs money, other conveyances, and Handy's specific agreement "All fishing, hunting, and recreational rights in or on that portion of Hertha Reservoir lying in Sections 7 and 18, Township 4 North, Range 69 West of the 6th P,M. together with access to exercise such rights remain the property of [Plaintiffs Dean G, Anderson and Betty Jo Anderson] , " 28, It was the intention of the parties to the 1983 Agreement to confirm Plaintiffs' exclusive ownership of all recreation rights on that part of the Hertha Reservoir located in said Sections. 29_ Subsequent to the 1983 Agreement Plaintiffs have exercised all said recreation rights on said part of the Hertha Reservoir to the exclusion of all other persons or entities, including Handy. 30_ Until 1995 both Plaintiffs and Handy believed that Plaintiffs Dean G, Anderson and Betty Jo Anderson were the sole owners of all said recreation rights_ 31, In 1995 Handy asserted for the first time that it may have some residual recreation rights on the interior part of the Hertha Reservoir which could only be exercised with due deference to Plaintiffs' hunting and fishing rights, also acknowledging that it had no recreation rights in the area of the 1983 enlargement_ 32, Any claim of recreation rights by Handy are contrary to the 1983 Agreement of the parties and their intention. 33, If the recorded i983 Agreement and Quit Claim Deeds do not confirm the exclusive ownership of all said recreation rights by Plaintiffs, then the 1983 contract has not been fully performed and further conveyance of those recreation rights should be made by Handy to the Plaintiffs. 34. Within weeks of determining that Handy may question Plaintiffs' ownership of said recreation rights, Plaintiffs demanded that Handy acknowledge by appropriate document that Andersons owned all recreation rights in Hertha Reservoir within said Sections 7 and 18 or, alternatively, that the parties effectively rescind the 1983 Agreement by reconveying land and returning other consideration paid. 35_ demands_ To date Handy has refused to comply with Plaintiffs' 36. Plaintiffs have fully performed the 1983 Agreement. Should there be any part of the 1983 Agreement which Plaintiffs have not fully performed they are ready, willing, and able to do so. 37. Since the real property or rights in the nature of real property are the subject matter of the 1983 Agreement, damages could not adequately compensate the Plaintiffs for Handy's refusal to convey 4