Laserfiche WebLink
<br />AlterJ/atil'e I,' No ,lctirJ/J <br /> <br />This altlTnJlivC' was considered lI11Jcccptablc as it docs 110t improve the existing storage capacity. By <br />laking no action now.lhe window ofoppurtunity would be lost for moving large volumes orsail to the <br />neighboring property. The adj~ccnt property is slated Cordcvdopmcnt and will ~uon be occupied by <br />residential \1cig.hb()rhoi..H'is. <br /> <br />AlterJ/atil'e 2: Lake Bottom Excal'atioll ill COlliullctioll with Earth Fill at t/II Ai/it/celli Provertv <br /> <br />rllis altcnwtivc (OIlSlS1s ol'the removal of approximately J.7 million cubic yards ofsoiJ and sediment <br />/l'ollllhe lake bottom. Approximately 2.5 million cubic yards will be movcd to a property adjacent !O <br />Ihe northeast shoreline of the lake. This material IS to be placed on the adjacent properly ill preparation <br />nrthc site t1.)r residential development. l;p to 1.2 million cuhic yards o/'l1laterial is to be hauled to.1 <br />nearhy mille sitc. Thc material hauled to the mine will he processed Ihrollgh the existing plant to <br />produce sand and gr~lvel products. <br /> <br />The malerials excavated li.om the bottom oCthe reservoir will include approximately 0.5 lee! oClake <br />bottom scdinlcnt and c\aycy overburden ovcdYlng a layer or sand and gravel with an average tblckncss <br />"Capproximately 12.5 Icel. ;\ compacted earlh slope liner is proposed to be cOllstrueted around the <br />pcrlmcl~r ul'thc cxcavationto reduce secpage losses between the reservoir and sand/gravel deposits. <br />This liller witl extend down to <1 foundation of claystone which underlies the sand. and g,ravd. <br /> <br />I;xcavali"n "rthe 3.7 million cubic yards oCsotl will increase the existing water storage capacity by <br />approxnl1alcly 2.2~0 acre-lceL <br /> <br />This alternative will increase the 3.v~lilablc water storage volume nfthe reservoir in a very economical <br />\V:J.y by ullllzing the excavated soils for constnlctlon on the adjacent properly and rClnovillg the sand and <br />gravel l'or processing at the nearby aggregate mine. The total cost of this altern<ltlve is estimated to be <br />$5.] 00.000 <br /> <br />Altenltll;Fe J: Lake Rottom Excul'(lf;on Independent orthe /'diacent Development <br /> <br />This alternative would involve the excavation ::md removal of lake bottom soils and sediments fCIl" haul <br />and placement al a location other than the adjacent property northeast or the lake. This alternative was <br />considered unacceptable do to the uncertainly regarding the need lor such a large volume or till at <br />anothcr property. In addition. the cosl involved with the haul or the excavated malerial would likely <br />involve over-the-road transport and a greater haul distance, slgnificantly adding to the cost to increase <br />the reservoir's storage. For examplt\ assllll1l11g a haul cost ot'$O. I 5 per cubic yard per mile, hauling the <br />exeavaled suil to a site 10 miles away would add S 1.50 per cubic yard or $3.75 l11i1hon to Ihc project <br />eos\. <br /> <br />Alternative 4: Incl'eu.\'inf.! lite J'"o/uJIle o(StoruJ!l! br flJCrellSiJJf.! the Jfei!!ht of/he Dam Embankment <br /> <br />ThIS alternative was eliminated from Lonsidcralion lx'cause the rescr\"()ir is Iocalcd ill all llrlXlll :-;elling. <br />and increasing thc dam height and wnter sllrt3cc level woulJ adversely Impact the Ilumerous rcsickntiJL <br />com11lcrclaL and municipal properties along the shore line'. To generate all increase III storage SImilar to <br />/\ltcrnative:; lL3kc Bottoll1 Excavation Independent of the Adjacl.'nt Dcvdnpment), the wa\er "urfacc <br />ek\'~ltinl1 would need to increase by approximately I J l"cel. rhis \\'ould requIre lengthening the dam <br /> <br />F~asil)lhty Study <br />Kern Rescr\'OIl' 1:lllargcllwnt <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />'\U);USl 20lJ2 <br /> <br />J 1),,11, 'I: II ",d"" I .1~C I" '1<" <br />