Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />: II <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />-16- <br /> <br />1. Information provided by the U.S. Forest Service indicated that <br />approximately 10 different soil types comprise the Sheriff Reservoir <br />basin. Upon evaluating the information provided by the Forest <br />Service regarding soils types, we assumed that hydrologic soil class <br />C applies to the entire basin. This assumption was confirmed by <br />field inspection. <br /> <br />2. Initial losses will be significant. Detailed inspection of USGS <br />topography indicates that between 5 and 10 percent of the basin <br />drains into depressions without outlets. The forest is filled with <br />many depressions that will pond water to a depth of over 1 to 3 feet <br />before any surface water runoff occurs. Much of the runoff from <br />talus slopes will be absorbed by the talus and will re-emerge <br />downgradient only after an extended time span. For these reasons and <br />others, high initial losses are appropriate for this basin. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />The Trout Creek, Sand Creek, and <br />downstream) of Sheriff Reservoir <br />are laden with massive rocks and <br />of 0.08 to 0.10 are appropriate. <br />percent are common. <br /> <br />tributary channels upstream (and <br />are steep and rugged. The channels <br />large trees and channel Un" factors <br />Channel slopes of greater than 5 <br /> <br />4. The hydrologic characteristics of the basin are best reflected by <br />subdividing the basin into 10 subbasins. In this way, routing pheno- <br />mena can be reasonably accounted for. <br /> <br />Based on these considerations, the PMF for the catchment above Sheriff <br />Reservoir was established using the Kinematic Wave subroutine within the model <br />HEC-1. These results were verified via the Snyder's Unit Hydrograph Procedure <br />within HEC-l. <br /> <br />When determining subbasin runoff with the Kinematic Wave method, three <br />conceptual elements were used: flow plains, collector channels, and a main <br />channel. The Kinematic Wave technique transforms rainfall excess into sub- <br />basin outflow. An overland flow element is described by four parameters: <br />1) a typical overland flow length, 2) slope, 3) roughness factor, and 4) the <br />percent of the drainage basin that is represented by the particular overland <br />flow element being modeled. Flow from the overland flow elements travels to <br />the subbasin outlet through one or two successive channel elements. Channel <br />elements are defined by length, slope, roughness, shape, width or diameter, <br />and side slope. <br /> <br />Snyder's unit hydrograph procedure is one of the more widely used unit <br />hydrograph techniques. A unit hydrograph is defined as the response of the <br />basin to one unit (usually an inch) of effective rainfall. The unit storm is <br />a rainfall of such duration that the period of surface runoff is not appre- <br />ciably less for any rain of shorter duration. The unit hydrograph represents <br />the integrated effects of factors such as tributary area, shape, drainage pat- <br />tern, channel capacities, and land slopes. The runoff response (design <br />hydrograph) of a design storm is determined by multiplying the ordinates of <br />the unit hydrograph by incremental rainfall excess depths of the design storm <br />and summing each of the resulting incremental runoff hydrographs sequentially <br />