Laserfiche WebLink
<br />II <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />'I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />-13- <br /> <br />percent losses from diversion from Oak Creek to the distribution system <br />intake, there would be 684 acre-feet per year of yield to the Town's water <br />system during an average year. It should be noted that this estimate assumes <br />that the full 986.5 acre-feet of storage right is available each year. <br /> <br />Records to indicate the firm yield of the Town's water rights do not <br />ex i st. However, streamfl ow data from 1954, the dri est year on record, show <br />that the flow in Oak Creek at the town was not less than 0.5 cfs throughout <br />the year. Assuming that diversion of 0.5 cfs is possible year round, the firm <br />yield of the Town's water rights is conservatively estimated at 360 acre-feet. <br />This is a conservative estimate because it assumes that Sheriff Reservoir <br />water will not be available. No data exist that show the yield of Sheriff <br />Reservoir for 1954 or for other years. <br /> <br />The average annual yield of treated water from the Oak Creek water right <br />and Sheriff Reservoir storage is compared to the current demand in Table 1. <br />Table 1 shows that the yield from the Oak Creek right (0.5 cfs) and Sheriff <br />Reservoir storage provides 'over twice the current water demand for the Town. <br />At a minimum, Sheriff Reservoir supplies 25 percent of the current demand. <br />