My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00188
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00188
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:11 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 11:42:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
FS0030X
Contractor Name
Dolores Project USBR 1963
Contract Type
Miscellaneous
Water District
0
County
Montezuma
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
282
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />BUREAU OF r.mIES <br /> <br />OWNERSHIP <br /> <br />A check of Federal Dlats at the Bureau of Land r.~enageroent revealed <br />that there are no patented !"lining claims anywhere near the resenoir area. <br /> <br />Plat books at the NontezUIl!8. County courthouse sllow all lands in secs. <br />23,24,25,26,35. and 36, T. 39 N.. R. 18 H., and secs. 19. 20, 29,30, <br />31, 8Ild 32, T. 39 Tr., R. 17 H., are privately owned. ~'Pending upon the <br />date and terms of the patent. mineral rights may or J1l8..V not have been con- <br />veyed frOIl'. the Federal eovernment. Abstracts of title for indiviC:ual <br />tracts vere not examined for this iten. It was ass~ed that mineral <br />rights vent vith the surface; therefore, the area wa$ not open to staking <br />of mining claims. <br /> <br />To check this factor, several local residents 'Were asked if they knew <br />of any mining claim locations in the near vicinity; no one did. Hooded <br />areas weTe examined for claim corners, discovery pits, and bul.ldczer <br />trenChing, but none vas found. <br /> <br />DESCRIPTIOU OF DAB Mm nSERVOIR <br /> <br />,.~' ) <br /> <br />Cahone D8.Il1 is one of a. series planned for developing vater resources <br />of the Dolores River in southwestern Colorado. AB proposed, the reservoir <br />would ha.<fe a normal wat.er surface altitude of 6,822.5 feet and an active <br />capacity of approximately 4 ,000 acre~:feet. The dBJJl ...,ould be an earthfill <br />structure approximately 2,000 feet long an~ 75 feet high (figs. 3 and 4). <br /> <br />Hater would flow into the reservoir by cllDal from EcPhee Reservoir on <br />the Dolores River. All waters would be for irrigEl,tion; power vould not be <br />a consideration. The draina.ge basin behina the aan woula be too limited <br />in area for the dam to have any flood-control value. <br /> <br />GEOLOGY <br /> <br />As indicated by fie:ure 5, only the Dakota formation is elq)osed in <br />the dam and reservoir areas. The lovest present exposures. located. in the <br />canyon botto~ at the dam axis, reveal sandstones, carbonaceous shales. and <br />l01f-crade subbituminous cocl. It is aSS1,.lllJed that the buff sandstones snd <br />gray shales, exposed in a borrow cut just west of the axis of the dam, <br />extend throueh the smell reservoir area (fig. 6). <br /> <br />Recent aeolian deposits of red-brown., sandy, leell clay cover It!ost of <br />the area. This 18 the material that forms the farm soil and alBo effec_ <br />tively covers all of the older depositB. Auger tests by the Bureau of <br />Reclamation indicate that this material bas a r.J/lXimum thickness of 15 feet <br />and has a probable averace. tt'.ioe.r.t\.'a$'! I;)f ~ 'to ') feet. <br /> <br />As indicated by structure contours on the buse of the Dakota forma_ <br />tion. shown in figure 5. thi$ proposed reservoir lies on the axis of a <br /> <br />99 <br /> <br />,." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.