Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />rapidly, most likely due to freeze-thaw effects. The concrete is somewhat porous in nature <br />due to the large size of aggregate used, and no air entraining was utilized in past times to <br />increase its resistance to freeze-thaw. Portions of the structure have cracked and fallen off, <br />and the downstream concrete apron is broken into pieces in some areas. The upstream <br />approach slab is highly eroded and has broken off in some areas. <br /> <br />The defect that may cause the greatest concern is the poor joint contact between the piers and <br />the base slab. The piers support the gates and stop logs and take the full force of the <br />hydrostatic head. Shear at the joint is in excess of 25,000 pounds per pier which would be <br />insignificant if the joints were sound. <br /> <br />Due to the poor condition of the diversion structure, the potential for failure during a flood is <br />real. The structure's operational platform (walkway) is low enough that trash accumulation <br />often occurs during a flood which creates a dam across the structure. The gates cannot be <br />raised above high water which would allow floating debris to pass. This could increase the <br />pressure on the structure by as much as 50 percent and decrease the overall stability, <br />similarly, by as much as 50 percent. <br /> <br />A failure of the structure would impede the Owner from diverting into the canal creating the <br />potential for a loss of at least 21,000 acre-feet of water per year. This could produce <br />enormous losses to the agricultural water users in the New Cache La Poudre system if the <br />structure could not be utilized to divert water during the irrigation season. Some temporary <br />structure could be placed in the river but could not be accomplished until after the flood had <br />passed. Any temporary solution would be expensive and would take from weeks to months to <br />construct. <br /> <br />3. Svstem ODeration <br /> <br />The water right is administered by the Water Commissioner for the Cache La Poudre River <br />system. Based upon discussions with the Commissioner and with The New Cache La Poudre <br />Manager, the water supply at the diversion has been administered on a main channel control <br />structure. That is, the Commissioner only requires that flows below the structure be sufficient <br />to provide for senior right. The senior rights downstream are two decrees to the B. H. Eaton <br />for 51.5 cfs and to the Whitney Ditch for 29.1 cfs. <br /> <br />The river section downstream of the diversion has been rated to determine the flow at <br />different gauge heights. However, the date of the rating and the accuracy are in question. <br /> <br />The allocation of water in the Poudre River system is based on filling senior direct diversion <br />rights in order of priority or order of rank within the system. This system of f11ling the water <br />right with the highest priority first is essentially followed. However, in wet years, reservoirs <br />in the system are often filled out of order. <br /> <br />PAGE 2 - CbapterV <br />