Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,. <br /> <br />. <br />, <br /> <br />Mr. John Horton <br /> <br />-4- <br /> <br />September 30, 1987 <br /> <br />Upon completion of the work above, we will complete <br />appropriate evaluations to develop a financial program for the <br />project in accordance with the requirements of the ewCB. The <br />financial program may include such work as allocating project <br />costs to each of the project purposes identified during earlier <br />portions of the work program, analysis of the costs allocated to <br /> <br />each purpose, derivation of revenues to pay the reimbursable <br />project costs, and a payout schedule showing each major item of <br />income and expense, principal and interest payment on <br />construction funding for each year of the repayment period. In <br />accordance with the requirements of the ewCB, and emergency <br />operating reserve will be included in the financial program <br />development. <br /> <br />Discussion of Alternative Modification Schemes <br /> <br />The Cucharas No.5 dam was constructed in the early 1900's. <br />Many concrete-faced rockfill dams constructed prior to the early <br />1960's have experienced large deformations, leakage and piping <br />problems similar to those which occured with the Cucharas No. 5 <br />dam. Subsequently, a variety of improved design and construction <br />methods have been implemented which have significantly improved <br />the performance of concrete-faced rockfill dams. Some of the <br />improved design and construction methods include 1) compacting <br />rockfill materials, 2) constructing graded filter/drainage <br />systems behind the concrete facing, 3) special excavation and <br />treatments for foundation bedrock contacts, and 4) revisions to <br />traditional toe slab, perimeter joint and facing slab details. <br />It shall be the intent of these feasibility level evaluations to <br />consider implementing these new design and construction methods <br />into the existing structure to the extent possible. Our <br />feasibility evaluations will include such considerations as 1) <br />removal and replacement of the upper 60 to 80 feet of the dam <br />with compacted rockfill and 2) construction of a filter/drain <br />system behind a new concrete facing. Consideration will also be <br />given to modifying the existing upstream and downstream slopes of <br />the dam to enhance overall stability. <br /> <br />In addition, our feasibility evaluations will include <br />consideration of hydrologic and hydraulic issues associated with <br />the existing spillway structure. Our previous studies have <br />indicated that the existing spillway cannot safely pass a <br />probable Maximum Flood event. Howeve,r, results of our <br />"Incremental Damage Assessment" resulted in a provisional <br />acceptance by the Colorado State Engi~eers Office of the existing <br />spillway configuration. The feasibility evaluations will <br />consider borrow from the spillway cha,~nel in order to increase <br />its flood routing capacity. <br /> <br /><t> GEarECHNlCAL E:S'GINEERS INC. <br />