Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />TABLE IV.4 <br />MONTHLY WATER USE BY SENIOR DIRECT FLOW RIGHTS <br /> <br />------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />MONTH <br /> <br />WATER USE <br />PERCENl O~ MAXIMUM ACRE-FEEl <br /> <br />------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />January 0 0 <br />February 0 0 <br />March 0 0 <br />April 50 2440 <br />?-lay 66 3328 <br />June 100 4879 <br />July 100 5042 <br />August 100 5042 <br />Sep tembe r 50 2440 <br />October 33 1664 <br />November 0 0 <br />December 0 0 <br />TOTAL 24,835 <br /> <br />The flows available for storage in Elkhead LaKe were estimated to average over <br />55,000 acre-feet per year. Annual flo..s in Elkhead Creek ranged from 12,400 <br />acre-feet in 1977 to 127,400 acre-feet in 1984. <br /> <br />While the foregoing analysis provides an indication of water availability on <br />El khead Creek, the exi st i ng Cra i g water supply system is heavily dependent <br />upon flow conditions in the Yampa River. <br /> <br />The long-term average annual discharge in the Yampa River at Craig is <br />approximately 950,000 acre-feet per year. During the late sUr.J1ler months of <br />extremely dry years, the flow has been as low as 3 cfs. At thi s 1 evel of <br />flow, Craig's direct flow rights would not be adequate to meet its nee1s, <br />because there would not be enough flow in the river to allow full diversion. <br />Periods of 10'" flow were in the range of 3 to 5 cfs for the years 1933 a~d <br />1977. <br /> <br />- 25 - <br />